438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15119886)
1. Effect of autogenous harvest site location on the outcome of ridge augmentation for implant dehiscences.
Veis AA; Tsirlis AT; Parisis NA
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 15119886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report.
Tolstunov L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lateral ridge augmentation and implant placement: an experimental study evaluating implant osseointegration in different augmentation materials in the canine mandible.
von Arx T; Cochran DL; Hermann JS; Schenk RK; Higginbottom FL; Buser D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 11432654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation.
Le B; Burstein J; Sedghizadeh PP
Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 18332757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases.
Hämmerle CH; Jung RE; Yaman D; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 17956571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of corticocancellous allogeneic bone blocks for augmentation of alveolar bone defects.
Peleg M; Sawatari Y; Marx RN; Santoro J; Cohen J; Bejarano P; Malinin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):153-62. PubMed ID: 20209198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular bone harvesting for alveolar reconstruction and implant placement: subjective and objective cross-sectional evaluation of donor and recipient site up to 4 years.
Cordaro L; Torsello F; Miuccio MT; di Torresanto VM; Eliopoulos D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1320-6. PubMed ID: 21443607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study.
Fontana F; Santoro F; Maiorana C; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Simion M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1003-12. PubMed ID: 19216268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of ramus autogenous block grafts for vertical alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement: a pilot study.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J; Kleinman A; Rohrer MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11958407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous bone grafts and platelet-enriched fibrin glue with simultaneous implant placement.
Lee HJ; Choi BH; Jung JH; Zhu SJ; Lee SH; Huh JY; You TM; Li J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jan; 105(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 17900943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts.
Chiapasco M; Casentini P; Zaniboni M; Corsi E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22092480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of loading in regenerated bone in dehiscence defects following a combined approach of bone grafting and GBR.
Zambon R; Mardas N; Horvath A; Petrie A; Dard M; Donos N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):591-601. PubMed ID: 22092957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement.
Misch CM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):767-76. PubMed ID: 9425757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Rothamel D; Schwarz F; Herten M; Ferrari D; Mischkowski RA; Sager M; Becker J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 19492639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration and GTAM case illustrations.
Carlson-Mann LD; Ibbott CG; Grieman RB
Probe; 1996; 30(6):232-3. PubMed ID: 9611454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone quality at the implant site after reconstruction of a local defect of the maxillary anterior ridge with chin bone or deproteinised cancellous bovine bone.
Meijndert L; Raghoebar GM; Schüpbach P; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):877-84. PubMed ID: 15978776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advances in the use of guided tissue regeneration for localized ridge augmentation in combination with dental implants.
Wilson TG; Buser D
Tex Dent J; 1994 Jul; 111(7):5, 7-10. PubMed ID: 8633300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and histologic evaluation of bone-replacement grafts in the treatment of localized alveolar ridge defects. Part 1: Mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.
Feuille F; Knapp CI; Brunsvold MA; Mellonig JT
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Feb; 23(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12617366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
