144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15120384)
1. Efficiencies of maximum likelihood methods of phylogenetic inferences when different substitution models are used.
Piontkivska H
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Jun; 31(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 15120384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
Takahashi K; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic algorithm-based maximum-likelihood analysis for molecular phylogeny.
Katoh K; Kuma K; Miyata T
J Mol Evol; 2001; 53(4-5):477-84. PubMed ID: 11675608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstructing phylogeny by quadratically approximated maximum likelihood.
Woodhams MD; Hendy MD
Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i348-54. PubMed ID: 15262819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical foundation to estimate the relative efficiencies of the Jukes-Cantor+gamma model and the Jukes-Cantor model in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
Som A
Gene; 2006 Dec; 385():103-10. PubMed ID: 16979305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A rapid heuristic algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.
Rodin A; Li WH
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Aug; 16(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 10942605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scoredist: a simple and robust protein sequence distance estimator.
Sonnhammer EL; Hollich V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():108. PubMed ID: 15857510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient likelihood computations with nonreversible models of evolution.
Boussau B; Gouy M
Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):756-68. PubMed ID: 17060197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models.
Huelsenbeck J; Rannala B
Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):904-13. PubMed ID: 15764559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pitfalls of heterogeneous processes for phylogenetic reconstruction.
Stefankovic D; Vigoda E
Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 17366141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increasing the efficiency of searches for the maximum likelihood tree in a phylogenetic analysis of up to 150 nucleotide sequences.
Morrison DA
Syst Biol; 2007 Dec; 56(6):988-1010. PubMed ID: 18066931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.
Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B; Britton T
Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16507528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
Antezana M
J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximum likelihood supertrees.
Steel M; Rodrigo A
Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18398769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The application of model-based complexity inference method to molecular evolution analysis.
Ren F; Hiroshi T; Okayama T; Gojobori T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():367-71. PubMed ID: 10384480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.
Posada D
J Mol Evol; 2001 May; 52(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 11443347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the thoracican barnacles using molecular and morphological evidence: a comparison of several divergence time estimation approaches.
Pérez-Losada M; Høeg JT; Crandall KA
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):244-64. PubMed ID: 15205051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-homogeneous models of sequence evolution in the Bio++ suite of libraries and programs.
Dutheil J; Boussau B
BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 8():255. PubMed ID: 18808672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
