These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15120550)

  • 1. Perception of words and non-words in the upper and lower visual fields.
    Darker IT; Jordan TR
    Brain Lang; 2004 Jun; 89(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 15120550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries for face matching, letter naming, and lexical decision.
    Hagenbeek RE; Van Strien JW
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 12027390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres.
    Jordan TR; Redwood M; Patching GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 May; 15(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 12803965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words.
    Nazir TA; Ben-Boutayab N; Decoppet N; Deutsch A; Frost R
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):294-311. PubMed ID: 14967213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left visual-field advantage in the dual-stream RSVP task and reading-direction: a study in three nations.
    Smigasiewicz K; Shalgi S; Hsieh S; Möller F; Jaffe S; Chang CC; Verleger R
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):2852-60. PubMed ID: 20546763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of upper vs. lower and right vs. left visual fields using lexical decision.
    Goldstein A; Babkoff H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Nov; 54(4):1239-59. PubMed ID: 11765742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma.
    Varsori M; Perez-Fornos A; Safran AB; Whatham AR
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2691-705. PubMed ID: 15358064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading direction and attention: effects on lateralized ignoring.
    Eviatar Z
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Nov; 29(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 8573329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual processing time differences owing to visual field asymmetries.
    Carlsen AN; Maslovat D; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(10):1067-70. PubMed ID: 17558298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interhemispheric cooperation and non-cooperation during word recognition: evidence for callosal transfer dysfunction in dyslexic adults.
    Henderson L; Barca L; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 17544495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of bilateral presentations on lateralized lexical decision.
    Fernandino L; Iacoboni M; Zaidel E
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Jun; 64(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 17257728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.