These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15121263)

  • 1. The CRABEL score--setting standards in maxillofacial medical note-keeping.
    Dhariwal DK; Gibbons AJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 15121263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality.
    Ho MY; Anderson AR; Nijjar A; Thomas C; Goenka A; Hossain J; Curley PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):454-7. PubMed ID: 16263017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An audit of medical record-keeping in maxillofacial surgery at the University College Hospital, Ibadan using the CRABEL Scoring system.
    Arotiba JT; Akinmoladun VI; Okoje VN
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2006 Mar; 35(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 17209334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of clinical notes for vascular surgery admissions: a CRABEL score review.
    Suh J; Roake JA; Lewis DR
    ANZ J Surg; 2009 Jul; 79(7-8):539-43. PubMed ID: 19694664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The CRABEL score--a method for auditing medical records.
    Crawford JR; Beresford TP; Lafferty KL
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jan; 83(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11212456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical hospital audit of record keeping (SHARK)--a new audit tool for the improvement in surgical record keeping.
    Grewal P
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 23618448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CRABEL Score Assessment for Oral Surgery Excision Biopsy Case Notes of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Aarthi S; Ramalingam K; Ramani P; Krishnan M
    Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57394. PubMed ID: 38694653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit.
    Bateman ND; Carney AS; Gibbin KP
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1999 Apr; 44(2):94-5. PubMed ID: 10230203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting the records straight--a prospective audit of the quality of case notes in a surgical department.
    Chamisa I; Zulu BM
    S Afr J Surg; 2007 Aug; 45(3):92, 94-5. PubMed ID: 17892187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The STAR score: a method for auditing clinical records.
    Tuffaha H; Amer T; Jayia P; Bicknell C; Rajaretnam N; Ziprin P
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2012 May; 94(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 22613300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The e-CRABEL score: an updated method for auditing medical records.
    Myuran T; Turner O; Ben Doostdar B; Lovett B
    BMJ Qual Improv Rep; 2017; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 28123748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of clinical case note entries: how good are we at achieving set standards?
    Osborn GD; Pike H; Smith M; Winter R; Vaughan-Williams E
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 16263018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inadequacies of hospital medical records.
    Patel AG; Mould T; Webb PJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Jan; 75(1 Suppl):7-9. PubMed ID: 8422161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ANKLe score: an audit of otolaryngology emergency clinic record keeping.
    Dexter SC; Hayashi D; Tysome JR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2008 Apr; 90(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 18430339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Record keeping by undergraduate dental students: a clinical audit.
    Pessian F; Beckett HA
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):703-5. PubMed ID: 15592553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving problem oriented medical records through self-audit.
    Dickie GL; Bass MJ
    J Fam Pract; 1980 Mar; 10(3):487-90. PubMed ID: 6965502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma--completion of the audit cycle.
    Nicopoullos JD; Karrar S; Gour A; Panter K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12881077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard.
    Shayah A; Agada FO; Gunasekaran S; Jassar P; England RJ
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 61(4):677-9. PubMed ID: 17394439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Documentation in orthopaedic surgery - do integrated care pathways work?
    Crawford JR; Shanahan M
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 May; 85(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 12831495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidisciplinary case notes: an audit.
    Hunt M
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Jul; 14(10):701-3. PubMed ID: 10481720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.