760 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15121388)
1. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus D; McDonald HR
Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 15121388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laser scanning imaging for macular disease: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
McDonald HR; Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus DM; ;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1221-8. PubMed ID: 17466377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography.
Griffith SP; Freeman WL; Shaw CJ; Mitchell WH; Olden CR; Figgs LD; Kinyoun JL; Underwood DL; Will JC
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jul; 37(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8345340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confocal microscopy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Kaufman SC; Musch DC; Belin MW; Cohen EJ; Meisler DM; Reinhart WJ; Udell IJ; Van Meter WS
Ophthalmology; 2004 Feb; 111(2):396-406. PubMed ID: 15019397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal thickness measurement in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Dueker DK; Singh K; Lin SC; Fechtner RD; Minckler DS; Samples JR; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1779-87. PubMed ID: 17822980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.
Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Li Z; Wu C; Olayiwola JN; Hilaire DS; Huang JJ
Conn Med; 2012 Feb; 76(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 22670358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LASIK for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Varley GA; Huang D; Rapuano CJ; Schallhorn S; Boxer Wachler BS; Sugar A;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1604-17. PubMed ID: 15288995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.
de Sonnaville JJ; van der Feltz van der Sloot D; Ernst L; Wijkel D; Heine RJ
Diabet Med; 1996 May; 13(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8737032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group.
Gonzalez ME; Gonzalez C; Stern MP; Arredondo B; Martinez S
Arch Med Res; 1995; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 7620277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy?
Moss SE; Meuer SM; Klein R; Hubbard LD; Brothers RJ; Klein BE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 May; 30(5):823-8. PubMed ID: 2656572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group (DDSG).
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 11484714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
