110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15121553)
1. Resource use for total and supracervical hysterectomies: results of a randomized trial.
Showstack J; Kuppermann M; Lin F; Vittinghoff E; Varner RE; Summitt RL; McNeeley SG; Learman LA; Richter H; Hulley S; Washington AE
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 103(5 Pt 1):834-41. PubMed ID: 15121553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual functioning after total compared with supracervical hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
Kuppermann M; Summitt RL; Varner RE; McNeeley SG; Goodman-Gruen D; Learman LA; Ireland CC; Vittinghoff E; Lin F; Richter HE; Showstack J; Hulley SB; Washington AE;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 105(6):1309-18. PubMed ID: 15932822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a prospective randomized study].
Morelli M; Noia R; Chiodo D; Mocciaro R; Costantino A; Caruso MT; Cosco C; Lucia E; Curcio B; Gullì G; Amendola G; Zullo F
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Feb; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17353868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supracervical hysterectomy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Milam MR; Sood AK; King S; Bassett RL; Lu KH; Slomovitz BM; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):641-6. PubMed ID: 17329515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.
Learman LA; Summitt RL; Varner RE; McNeeley SG; Goodman-Gruen D; Richter HE; Lin F; Showstack J; Ireland CC; Vittinghoff E; Hulley SB; Washington AE;
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 102(3):453-62. PubMed ID: 12962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
Jenkins TR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1875-84. PubMed ID: 15592268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Payer costs in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization, hysterectomy, or myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids.
Dembek CJ; Pelletier EM; Isaacson KB; Spies JB
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Oct; 18(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 17911509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation of uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial.
Volkers NA; Hehenkamp WJ; Smit P; Ankum WM; Reekers JA; Birnie E
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jul; 19(7):1007-16; quiz 1017. PubMed ID: 18589314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost and reimbursement for three fibroid treatments: abdominal hysterectomy, abdominal myomectomy, and uterine fibroid embolization.
Goldberg J; Bussard A; McNeil J; Diamond J
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 17031734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative urinary incontinence after total abdominal hysterectomy or supracervical hysterectomy: a metaanalysis.
Robert M; Soraisham A; Sauve R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 198(3):264.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18199420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy performed with and without excision of the endocervix: a randomized controlled trial.
Berner E; Qvigstad E; Langebrekke A; Lieng M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 23506716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the long-term effects of simple total abdominal hysterectomy with transcervical endometrial resection on urinary incontinence.
Allahdin S; Harrild K; Warraich QA; Bain C
BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 17970792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supracervical hysterectomy.
Kives S; Lefebvre G;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Jan; 32(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 20370984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of treatments for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Wade SW; Magee G; Metz L; Broder MS
J Reprod Med; 2006 Jul; 51(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 16913546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]