421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15122467)
1. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].
Winnekendonk G; Krug B; Warm M; Göhring UJ; Mallmann P; Lackner K
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach.
Fischer U; Kopka L; Grabbe E
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 10580970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [MRI of the breast. Techniques and current values].
Gilles R
Cancer Radiother; 2003 Nov; 7 Suppl 1():115s-119s. PubMed ID: 15124552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI-guided diffuse optical spectroscopy of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Ntziachristos V; Yodh AG; Schnall MD; Chance B
Neoplasia; 2002; 4(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 12082551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic value of ADC and rADC of diffusion weighted imaging in malignant breast lesions].
Xie CM; Yin SH; Li H; Liu XW; Zhang Y; Lü YC; Zhang R; Li JP; Geng ZJ; Wu PH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 32(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 20450592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast lesion localization: a freehand, interactive MR imaging-guided technique.
Daniel BL; Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; Jeffrey SS; Black JW; Block WF; Sawyer-Glover AM; Glover GH; Herfkens RJ
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 9577495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of methods for quantifying contrast enhancement exemplified by dynamic MRI mammography].
Knopp MV; Himmelhan N; Radeleff J; Junkermann H; Hess T; Sinn HP; Brix G
Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12063736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contrast-enhanced MR-mammography in a pregnant woman with breast carcinoma].
Hauth E; Umutlu L; Forsting M
Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1083-4. PubMed ID: 17879180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
