These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15122501)

  • 1. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.
    Endler JA; Mappes J
    Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.
    Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Warning signals evolve to disengage Batesian mimics.
    Franks DW; Ruxton GD; Sherratt TN
    Evolution; 2009 Jan; 63(1):256-67. PubMed ID: 18786193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.
    Merilaita S; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense.
    Sherratt TN; Beatty CD
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 14582002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multimodal warning signals for a multiple predator world.
    Ratcliffe JM; Nydam ML
    Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7209):96-9. PubMed ID: 18769439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How bright and how nasty: explaining diversity in warning signal strength.
    Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    Evolution; 2007 Mar; 61(3):623-35. PubMed ID: 17348925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolutionary implications of the form of predator generalization for aposematic signals and mimicry in prey.
    Ruxton GD; Franks DW; Balogh AC; Leimar O
    Evolution; 2008 Nov; 62(11):2913-21. PubMed ID: 18752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence.
    Broom M; Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 16529773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.
    Gamberale G; Tullberg BS
    Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities.
    Beatty CD; Beirinckx K; Sherratt TN
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7004):63-6. PubMed ID: 15343332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses.
    Jeschke JM
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(4):900-7. PubMed ID: 16842823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of initial protection of conspicuous mutants for the coevolution of defense and aposematic signaling of the defense: a modeling study.
    Ruxton GD; Speed MP; Broom M
    Evolution; 2007 Sep; 61(9):2165-74. PubMed ID: 17767588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predator behaviour and predation risk in the heterogeneous Arctic environment.
    Lecomte N; Careau V; Gauthier G; Giroux JF
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 18248387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.
    Kimbrell T; Holt RD; Lundberg P
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(2):218-34. PubMed ID: 17888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predation on mutualists can reduce the strength of trophic cascades.
    Knight TM; Chase JM; Hillebrand H; Holt RD
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Nov; 9(11):1173-8. PubMed ID: 17040319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.