These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15122739)

  • 1. A risk-adjusted Sets method for monitoring adverse medical outcomes.
    Grigg OA; Farewell VT
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1593-602. PubMed ID: 15122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mortality surveillance in an intensive care unit].
    Haagensen R; Smith-Erichsen N
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Nov; 128(22):2567-9. PubMed ID: 19023352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct comparison of risk-adjusted and non-risk-adjusted CUSUM analyses of coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes.
    Novick RJ; Fox SA; Stitt LW; Forbes TL; Steiner S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 16872967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer tools to assist the monitoring of outcomes in surgery.
    Sherlaw-Johnson C; Gallivan S; Treasure T; Nashef SA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 26(5):1032-6. PubMed ID: 15519199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting outcomes in cardiac surgery: risk stratification matters?
    Dupuis JY
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 23(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 18830070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
    Shahian DM; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring cardiac surgical performance: a commentary.
    Treasure T; Gallivan S; Sherlaw-Johnson C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Dec; 128(6):823-5. PubMed ID: 15573065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring binary outcomes using risk-adjusted charts: a comparative study.
    Gombay E; Hussein AA; Steiner SH
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(23):2815-26. PubMed ID: 21786279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36.
    Walters SJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 May; 2():26. PubMed ID: 15161494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception and reporting of cardiac surgical performance.
    Klein AA; Nashef SA
    Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Sep; 12(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18805853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk-adjusted cesarean section rates for the assessment of physician performance in Taiwan: a population-based study.
    Tang CH; Wang HI; Hsu CS; Su HW; Chen MJ; Lin HC
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():246. PubMed ID: 17029640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk adjustment and outcome measures for out-of-hospital respiratory distress.
    Keim SM; Spaite DW; Maio RF; Garrison HG; Desmond JS; Gregor MA; O'malley PJ; Stiell IG; Cayten CG; Chew JL; Mackenzie EJ; Miller DR
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Oct; 11(10):1074-81. PubMed ID: 15466151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishing the scope and methodological approach to out-of-hospital outcomes and effectiveness research.
    Keim SM; Spaite DW; Maio RF; Garrison HG; Desmond JS; Gregor MA; O'malley PJ; Stiell IG; Cayten CG; Chew JL; Mackenzie EJ; Miller DR
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Oct; 11(10):1067-73. PubMed ID: 15466150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-adjusted intensive care unit outcomes and admission from our backyard.
    Parshuram CS
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2008 Jan; 9(1):118-9. PubMed ID: 18185125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monitoring the performance of intensive care units using the variable life-adjusted display: a simulation study to explore its applicability and efficiency.
    Foltran F; Baldi I; Bertolini G; Merletti F; Gregori D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 19522905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction--databases and the assessment of complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease.
    Jacobs JP
    Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():1-37. PubMed ID: 19063774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review of the application of risk-adjusted charts to analyse mortality outcomes in critical care.
    Cook DA; Duke G; Hart GK; Pilcher D; Mullany D
    Crit Care Resusc; 2008 Sep; 10(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 18798724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
    Zhu H; Hill MD
    Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons of risk-adjusted clinical outcomes for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage across eight teaching hospitals in Japan.
    Ishizaki T; Imanaka Y; Sekimoto M; Fukuda H; Mihara H;
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Jun; 14(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 18373576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.