These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15123095)

  • 1. [Embryo donation in France, in Europe and in the United States].
    Plachot M
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Apr; 32(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 15123095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current practices of oocyte donation in France and Europe].
    Letur H
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Dec; 36(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 17850990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How can the genetic risks of embryo donation be minimized? Proposed guidelines of the French Federation of CECOS (Centre d'Etude et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme).
    Eydoux P; Thepot F; Fellmann F; Francannet C; Simon-Bouy B; Jouannet P; Bresson JL; Siffroi JP;
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Aug; 19(8):1685-8. PubMed ID: 15192062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Oocyte donation as in France].
    Le Lannou D; Griveau JF; Veron E; Jaffre F; Jouve G; Descheemaeker V; Gueho A; Morcel K
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Jan; 38(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20022281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Are French results in assisted reproductive techniques so bad?].
    Pouly JL; Larue L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 17208496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproductive technologies between Europe and the USA.
    Gleicher N; Weghofer A; Barad D
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1945-50. PubMed ID: 16690628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Law No. 94-654 of 29 July 1994 on the donation and use of elements and products of the human body, medically assisted procreation, and prenatal diagnosis. (Journal officiel de la République française, Lois et Décrets, 30 July 1994, No. 175, p. 11060-11068).
    France
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1994; 45(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 11660848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elements to be considered in obtaining informed consent for ART.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5 Suppl 1):S272-3. PubMed ID: 17055840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Embryo donation in France: practice and difficulties. Strasbourg's experience].
    Bettahar-Lebugle K; Wittemer C; Firtion C; Rongières C; Ohl J; Nisand I; Viville S; Favre R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Feb; 35(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 17223603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross-country study.
    Abadie A; Gay S
    J Health Econ; 2006 Jul; 25(4):599-620. PubMed ID: 16490267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    Andersen AN; Goossens V; Ferraretti AP; Bhattacharya S; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; ;
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 18281243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Register data on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Europe including a detailed description of ART in Denmark.
    Nyboe Andersen A; Erb K
    Int J Androl; 2006 Feb; 29(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16466519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures.
    Clayton HB; Schieve LA; Peterson HB; Jamieson DJ; Reynolds MA; Wright VC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 16507930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Medically assisted procreation in France; current situation and future prospects].
    Jouannet P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2008 Jan; 192(1):117-29; discussion 129-32. PubMed ID: 18663986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genethics. Cloning talk turns serious.
    Lagay F
    Virtual Mentor; 2001 Apr; ():E6. PubMed ID: 15612150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Oocyte donation in France and national balance sheet (GEDO). Different European approaches].
    Letur-Könirsch H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Feb; 32(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 15123132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Being pregnant over 45 after oocyte donation in a foreign country. A wonder of medicine or an ethical transgression?].
    Marchaudon V; Piccardino O; Dufour P; Subtil D; Deruelle P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Dec; 35(12):1235-8. PubMed ID: 18035574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2002. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    ; Andersen AN; Gianaroli L; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1680-97. PubMed ID: 16585126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incentives for organ donation in the United States: feasible alternative or forthcoming apocalypse?
    Hippen B; Matas A
    Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2009 Apr; 14(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 19307965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.