These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15123108)

  • 1. [Cesarean section on maternal request: pros].
    Shojai R; Boubli L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Apr; 32(4):347-9; discussion 347. PubMed ID: 15123108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns.
    Bettes BA; Coleman VH; Zinberg S; Spong CY; Portnoy B; DeVoto E; Schulkin J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 17197588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference.
    Coleman-Cowger VH; Erickson K; Spong CY; Portnoy B; Croswell J; Schulkin J
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 20337204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004.
    Bernstein PS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):784; author reply 784-5. PubMed ID: 17329539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery.
    Ghetti C; Chan BK; Guise JM
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 15566340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Norwegian obstetricians' opinions about cesarean section on maternal request: should women pay themselves?
    Fuglenes D; Oian P; Gyrd-Hansen D; Olsen JA; Kristiansen IS
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1582-8. PubMed ID: 20925586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.
    Finsen V; Storeheier AH; Aasland OG
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 18507582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obstetrician's fear of childbirth: how did it happen?
    Klein MC
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 16128975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cesarean section on maternal request: cons].
    Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004 Apr; 32(4):350-1; discussion 347. PubMed ID: 15164733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient satisfaction with the prenatal care provider and the risk of cesarean delivery.
    Cohen JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):2029-32; discussion 2032-4. PubMed ID: 15970886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China.
    Zhang J; Liu Y; Meikle S; Zheng J; Sun W; Li Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 111(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18448738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.
    Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk-adjusted cesarean rates: what risk factors for cesarean delivery are important to practicing obstetricians?
    Bailit JL; Schulkin J; Dawson NV
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 17465286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Chittiphavorn S; Pinjaroen S; Suwanrath C; Soonthornpun K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16850670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean delivery by patient choice: where do things stand?
    Herbert WN
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2007 Mar; 62(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 17306040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesarean section rate levels off in 1987.
    Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Moien M
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(5):227-8. PubMed ID: 2806490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean section on demand: round one.
    Shah MA; Williams DR
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15010659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.
    Wax JR; Cartin A; Pinette MG; Blackstone J
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 16128974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The accuracy of predicting parity as a prerequisite for cesarean delivery on maternal request.
    Keeton K; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ubel PA; Fenner DE; Fagerlin A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 112(2 Pt 1):285-9. PubMed ID: 18669724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changing medical evidence brings shift in C-section stance.
    Carlson B
    Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 12(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 12575508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.