These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Norwegian obstetricians' opinions about cesarean section on maternal request: should women pay themselves? Fuglenes D; Oian P; Gyrd-Hansen D; Olsen JA; Kristiansen IS Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1582-8. PubMed ID: 20925586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say. Finsen V; Storeheier AH; Aasland OG Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 18507582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetrician's fear of childbirth: how did it happen? Klein MC Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):207-9. PubMed ID: 16128975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient satisfaction with the prenatal care provider and the risk of cesarean delivery. Cohen JR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):2029-32; discussion 2032-4. PubMed ID: 15970886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China. Zhang J; Liu Y; Meikle S; Zheng J; Sun W; Li Z Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 111(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18448738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches. Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk-adjusted cesarean rates: what risk factors for cesarean delivery are important to practicing obstetricians? Bailit JL; Schulkin J; Dawson NV J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 17465286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion. Chittiphavorn S; Pinjaroen S; Suwanrath C; Soonthornpun K J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16850670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean delivery by patient choice: where do things stand? Herbert WN Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2007 Mar; 62(3):153-4. PubMed ID: 17306040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean section rate levels off in 1987. Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Moien M Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(5):227-8. PubMed ID: 2806490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean section on demand: round one. Shah MA; Williams DR J Midwifery Womens Health; 2004; 49(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15010659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]