These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1512317)

  • 1. An objective quality assessment method for bit-reduction coding of wideband speech.
    Hayashi S; Kitawaki N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jul; 92(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 1512317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the quality of enhanced wideband speech with a cochlear model.
    Wirtzfeld MR; Pourmand N; Parsa V; Bruce IC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):EL319. PubMed ID: 28964067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual relevance of the temporal envelope to the speech signal in the 4-7 kHz band.
    Kim KT; Choi JY; Kang HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL88. PubMed ID: 17927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A perceptual study of source coding of Fourier phase and amplitude of the linear predictive coding residual of vowel sounds.
    Ma C; O'Shaughnessy D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2231-9. PubMed ID: 8201119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informativeness of critical ratios "useful signal-masking noise" in speech communication.
    Tzaneva L
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 1998 Nov; 6(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 9919381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency among speech parameter vectors: application to predicting speech intelligibility.
    Power MH; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3882-98. PubMed ID: 8969488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating nonnegative matrix model activations with deep neural networks to increase perceptual speech quality.
    Williamson DS; Wang Y; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1399-407. PubMed ID: 26428778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D; Xu J; Gibbs BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting binaural speech intelligibility using the signal-to-noise ratio in the envelope power spectrum domain.
    Chabot-Leclerc A; MacDonald EN; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):192. PubMed ID: 27475146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological significance of the zoning of the masking effect of noise, related to the adaptive capacities of the auditory analyzer for speech communication.
    Tzaneva L
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 1998 Nov; 6(4):291-2. PubMed ID: 9919380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monaural speech intelligibility and detection in maskers with varying amounts of spectro-temporal speech features.
    Schubotz W; Brand T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):524. PubMed ID: 27475175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.