930 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1512343)
1. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single chamber atrial pacing: a realistic option in sinus node disease: a long-term follow-up study of 213 patients.
Höijer CJ; Höglund P; Schüller H; Brandt J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jun; 30(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 17547606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction.
Velayuthan R; Sukumar SK; Bootla D; Balaguru S; Anantharaj A; Satheesh S; Selvaraj RJ
Indian Heart J; 2024; 76(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 38070672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with different mode of pacing. Long-term follow-up.
Folino AF; Buja G; Corso L Dal ; Nava A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):260-3. PubMed ID: 9474684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?
Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R
Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.
Andersen HR; Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Thuesen L; Mortensen PT; Vesterlund T; Pedersen AK
Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9086):1210-6. PubMed ID: 9652562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Senaratne J; Herath TT; Beaudette D; Irwin M; Gulamhusein S; Senaratne MP
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(42):e12833. PubMed ID: 30334983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical observations with long-term atrial pacing.
Böhm A; Pintér A; Székely A; Préda I
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):246-9. PubMed ID: 9474681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimizing ventricular pacing to reduce atrial fibrillation in sinus-node disease.
Sweeney MO; Bank AJ; Nsah E; Koullick M; Zeng QC; Hettrick D; Sheldon T; Lamas GA;
N Engl J Med; 2007 Sep; 357(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 17804844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acquired atrioventricular block in a patient with sinus node disease on single-chamber atrial pacing.
Vijayvergiya R; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2002; 54(4):435-6. PubMed ID: 12462677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.
Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adverse effects of first-degree AV-block in patients with sinus node dysfunction: data from the mode selection trial.
Holmqvist F; Hellkamp AS; Lee KL; Lamas GA; Daubert JP;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 37(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 24797760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Results of long-term permanent atrial stimulation in sick sinus disease].
Goicolea de Oro A; Bescós LL; Pastor Fuentes A; Esteban Paúl E; Kallmeyer Martín C; Chicote Ramos R
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):474-9. PubMed ID: 9304174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial.
Boriani G; Pieragnoli P; Botto GL; Puererfellner H; Mont L; Ziacchi M; Manolis AS; Gulizia M; Tukkie R; Landolina M; Ricciardi G; Cicconelli M; Grammatico A; Biffi M
Europace; 2019 Apr; 21(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 30649270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
Mutagaywa RK; Tumaini B; Chin A
Cardiovasc J Afr; 2021 Jan-Feb 23; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.
De Sisti A; Attuel P; Manot S; Fiorello P; Halimi F; Leclercq JF
Europace; 2000 Oct; 2(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 11194597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.
Sethi KK; Bajaj V; Mohan JC; Arora R; Khalilullah M
Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of atrioventricular block and chronic atrial flutter/fibrillation after implantation of atrial pacemakers; follow-up of more than ten years.
Elshot SR; el Gamal MI; Tielen KH; van Gelder BM
Int J Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 38(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 8463012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
