These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15124101)

  • 61. Environmental covariates: effects on the power of sib-pair linkage methods.
    Mandal DM; Sorant AJ; Pugh EW; Marcus SE; Klein AP; Mathias RA; O'Neill J; Temiyakarn LF; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S643-8. PubMed ID: 10597507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A statistical method for identification of polymorphisms that explain a linkage result.
    Sun L; Cox NJ; McPeek MS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):399-411. PubMed ID: 11791210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
    Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait loci by multiple markers.
    Jung J; Fan R; Jin L
    Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):881-98. PubMed ID: 15802526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Power of multipoint identity-by-descent methods to detect linkage using variance component models.
    Ekstrøm CT
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11754465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Score test for age at onset genetic linkage analysis in selected sibling pairs.
    Callegaro A; van Houwelingen HC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1913-26. PubMed ID: 19402027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The role of smoothing techniques in the interpretation of results from genomic scans using sib-pair data.
    Siegmund KD; Todorov AA; Rao DC; Borecki IB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1047-52. PubMed ID: 9433622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A new nonparametric linkage statistic for mapping both qualitative and quantitative trait loci.
    Camp NJ; Gutin A; Abkevich V; Farnham JM; Cannon-Albright L; Thomas A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S461-6. PubMed ID: 11793719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.
    Sham PC; Purcell S; Cherny SS; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Aug; 71(2):238-53. PubMed ID: 12111667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A simple allele sharing statistic for multiple locus systems.
    Barmada MM; Aston CE; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S497-501. PubMed ID: 10597482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The affected-/discordant-sib-pair design can guarantee validity of multipoint model-free linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees when there is marker-marker disequilibrium.
    Xing C; Sinha R; Xing G; Lu Q; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 79(2):396-401. PubMed ID: 16826532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis I: use of the mean statistic for affected sib pairs.
    Guo X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 18(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 10642424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A statistical method for adjusting covariates in linkage analysis with sib pairs.
    Wu CO; Zheng G; Leifer E; Follmann D; Lin JP
    BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51. PubMed ID: 14975119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Empirical significance values for linkage analysis: trait simulation using posterior model distributions from MCMC oligogenic segregation analysis.
    Igo RP; Wijsman EM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 17849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Exact multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in pedigrees by variance components.
    Pratt SC; Daly MJ; Kruglyak L
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1153-7. PubMed ID: 10712227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A method for identifying genes related to a quantitative trait, incorporating multiple siblings and missing parents.
    Kistner EO; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 16025442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. No "bias" toward the null hypothesis in most conventional multipoint nonparametric linkage analyses.
    Mukhopadhyay I; Feingold E; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Oct; 75(4):716-8; author reply 723-7. PubMed ID: 15338457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci in humans: an overview.
    Ghosh S; Reich T; Majumder PP
    Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Nov; 66(Pt 5-6):431-8. PubMed ID: 12485475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach.
    Kruglyak L; Daly MJ; Reeve-Daly MP; Lander ES
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Jun; 58(6):1347-63. PubMed ID: 8651312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.