170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15124784)
1. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study.
Bamzahim M; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15124784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance of DIAGnodent in the detection of secondary carious lesions.
Bamzahim M; Aljehani A; Shi XQ
Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Feb; 63(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 16095059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of proximal secondary caries at cervical class II-amalgam restoration margins in vitro.
Neuhaus KW; Rodrigues JA; Seemann R; Lussi A
J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 22429927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Caries detection under composite restorations by laser fluorescence and digital radiography.
Kositbowornchai S; Sukanya C; Tidarat T; Chanoggarn T
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Dec; 17(9):2079-84. PubMed ID: 23242816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In Vivo and In Vitro performance of Conventional Methods, DIAGNOdent, and an Electronic Caries Monitor for Occlusal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth.
Kucukyilmaz E; Sener Y; Botsali MS
Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):E14-22. PubMed ID: 26314593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of DIAGNOdent and Digital Radiography for Detection of Secondary Proximal Caries Adjacent to Composite Restorations.
Ghoncheh Z; Zonouzy Z; Kiomarsi N; Kharazifar MJ; Chiniforush N
J Lasers Med Sci; 2017; 8(4):172-176. PubMed ID: 29071022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of diagnodent in detection of occlusal caries in children.
Olmez A; Tuna D; Oznurhan F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 30(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 16937852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: an in vitro study.
Sridhar N; Tandon S; Rao N
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 19884717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of methods for the detection of secondary caries around amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Braga MM; Chiarotti AP; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 20339722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth.
Lussi A; Francescut P
Caries Res; 2003; 37(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 12566632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro detection of secondary caries associated with composite restorations on approximal surfaces using laser fluorescence.
Rodrigues JA; Neuhaus KW; Hug I; Stich H; Seemann R; Lussi A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 20945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison.
Shi XQ; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
Caries Res; 2000; 34(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 10773633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
