These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15124784)

  • 21. Using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) in surveys for the detection of noncavitated occlusal dentine caries.
    Rando-Meirelles MP; de Sousa Mda L
    Community Dent Health; 2011 Mar; 28(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 21485229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro study of laser diode 655 nm diagnosis of occlusal caries.
    Costa AM; Yamaguti PM; De Paula LM; Bezerra AC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):249-53, 233. PubMed ID: 12613306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int Dent J; 1991 Dec; 41(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 1800386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
    Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Initial in vitro evaluation of DIAGNOdent for detecting secondary carious lesions associated with resin composite restorations.
    Boston DW
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 12666859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validity of bite-wings for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with occlusal amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; van Amerongen JP; Penning C; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 8402808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In Vitro Comparison of Several Methods for Initial Proximal Caries Detection.
    Todorova V; Filipov I; Petrova R
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Jun; 62(2):358-364. PubMed ID: 32666744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of DIAGNOdent and two conventional diagnostic methods.
    Reis A; Zach VL; de Lima AC; de Lima Navarro MF; Grande RH
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(3):76-82. PubMed ID: 15688963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods.
    Attrill DC; Ashley PF
    Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(8):440-3. PubMed ID: 11352392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vivo comparison of the efficacy of DIAGNOdent by visual inspection and radiographic diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
    Akarsu S; Köprülü H
    J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(3):53-8. PubMed ID: 17022365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Grey discolouration and marginal fracture for the diagnosis of secondary caries in molars with occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Rudolphy MP; van Amerongen JP; Penning C; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 8521439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Association and comparison between visual inspection and bitewing radiography for the detection of recurrent dental caries under restorations.
    Lino JR; Ramos-Jorge J; Coelho VS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Moysés MR; Ribeiro JC
    Int Dent J; 2015 Aug; 65(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 26032493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validity of radiographs for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; Gorter Y; van Loveren C; van Amerongen JP
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions for occlusal surfaces.
    Valera FB; Pessan JP; Valera RC; Mondelli J; Percinoto C
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18435372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accurate Detection of Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries in Posterior Permanent Teeth: An in vivo Study.
    Alammar R; Sadaf D
    Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():1431-1436. PubMed ID: 32943960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In-vivo performance of impedance spectroscopy, laser fluorescence, and bitewing radiographs for occlusal caries detection.
    Mortensen D; Hessing-Olsen I; Ekstrand KR; Twetman S
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(4):293-299. PubMed ID: 29484311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    Sürme K; Kara NB; Yilmaz Y
    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2020 Feb; 38(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 31589586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correlation between fissure discoloration, Diagnodent measurements, and caries depth: an in vitro study.
    Francescut P; Lussi A
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 14733470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor: in vitro comparison.
    Bamzahim M; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Dec; 60(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 12512886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.