These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15124975)
1. Social work and the Supreme Court: a clash of values; a time for action. Lens V Soc Work; 2004 Apr; 49(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 15124975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive Justice: A Policy Window for Social Work Advocacy. Smith BD Soc Work; 2017 Jul; 62(3):221-226. PubMed ID: 28444300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond personhood and autonomy: moral theory and the premises of privacy. Rappaport AJ Utah Law Rev; 2001; 2001(2):441-507. PubMed ID: 16538746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses. Warren MA Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear fetal protection employment policy. Michel SE Occup Health Saf; 1990 Jul; 59(7):40-1. PubMed ID: 2388739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A Troubling Court Decision for Reproductive Rights: Legal Recognition of Fetal Standing to Sue. Fox D; Adashi EY; Cohen IG JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):23-24. PubMed ID: 31116380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and dialogue. Colker R Tulane Law Rev; 1989 Jun; 63(6):1363-403. PubMed ID: 11659218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The social meaning of the Norplant condition: constitutional considerations of race, class, and gender. Albiston C Berkeley Womens Law J; 1994; 9():9-57. PubMed ID: 16767841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Normative judgment, social change, and legal reasoning in the context of abortion and privacy. Schnably SJ Rev Law Soc Change; 1984-1985; 13(4):715-910. PubMed ID: 11659092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Substantial Shifts in Supreme Court Health Law Jurisprudence. Gostin LO; Hodge JG JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1431-1432. PubMed ID: 30193377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion. McConnell MW Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner. Garfield H Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Public reason and political conflict: abortion and homosexuality. George RP Yale Law J; 1997 Jun; 106(8):2475-504. PubMed ID: 12569946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Living with Roe v. Wade. McConnell ML Commentary; 1990 Nov; 90(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 11656047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]