204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15125003)
1. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
Song W; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The theoretical benefit of beam fringe compensation and field size reduction for iso-normal tissue complication probability dose escalation in radiotherapy of lung cancer.
Engelsman M; Remeijer P; van Herk M; Mijnheer B; Damen E
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of optimization on surface dose in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Thomas SJ; Hoole AC
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):4919-28. PubMed ID: 15584527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of target size and tissue density on the minimum margin required for random errors.
Witte MG; van der Geer J; Schneider C; Lebesque JV; van Herk M
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3068-79. PubMed ID: 15587660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Field size reduction enables iso-NTCP escalation of tumor control probability for irradiation of lung tumors.
Engelsman M; Remeijer P; van Herk M; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; Damen EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Dec; 51(5):1290-8. PubMed ID: 11728689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From physical dose constraints to equivalent uniform dose constraints in inverse radiotherapy planning.
Thieke C; Bortfeld T; Niemierko A; Nill S
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2332-9. PubMed ID: 14528955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of breathing and set-up errors on the cumulative dose to a lung tumor.
Engelsman M; Damen EM; De Jaeger K; van Ingen KM; Mijnheer BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Jul; 60(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 11410310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical note: dose-volume histogram analysis in radiotherapy using the Gaussian error function.
Chow JC; Markel D; Jiang R
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1398-402. PubMed ID: 18491534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The incidence of inclusion of the sigmoid colon and small bowel in the planning target volume in radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
De Meerleer GO; Villeirs GM; Vakaet L; Delrue LJ; De Neve WJ
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):573-81. PubMed ID: 15378188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.
van Herk M; Remeijer P; Lebesque JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Apr; 52(5):1407-22. PubMed ID: 11955756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming.
D'Souza WD; Meyer RR; Shi L
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(15):3465-81. PubMed ID: 15379026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The width of margins in radiotherapy treatment plans.
McKenzie AL; van Herk M; Mijnheer B
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3331-42. PubMed ID: 11098907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
