247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15125007)
1. Segmentation of IMRT plans for radical lung radiotherapy delivery with the step-and-shoot technique.
Nioutsikou E; Bedford JL; Christian JA; Brada M; Webb S
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):892-901. PubMed ID: 15125007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer.
Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method of calculating a lung clinical target volume DVH for IMRT with intrafractional motion.
Kung JH; Zygmanski P; Choi N; Chen GT
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1103-9. PubMed ID: 12852534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of sparing lung and other thoracic structures with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Liu HH; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Liao Z; Stevens CW; Guerrero TM; Komaki R; Cox JD; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1268-79. PubMed ID: 15001272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose and volume reduction for normal lung using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.
Murshed H; Liu HH; Liao Z; Barker JL; Wang X; Tucker SL; Chandra A; Guerrero T; Stevens C; Chang JY; Jeter M; Cox JD; Komaki R; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1258-67. PubMed ID: 15001271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model.
Fogliata A; Bolsi A; Cozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Jan; 66(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 12559518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planning evaluation of radiotherapy for complex lung cancer cases using helical tomotherapy.
Kron T; Grigorov G; Yu E; Yartsev S; Chen JZ; Wong E; Rodrigues G; Trenka K; Coad T; Bauman G; Van Dyk J
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3675-90. PubMed ID: 15446797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new smoothing procedure to reduce delivery segments for static MLC-based IMRT planning.
Sun X; Xia P
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1158-65. PubMed ID: 15191305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT.
Duan J; Shen S; Spencer SA; Ahmed RS; Popple RA; Ye SJ; Brezovich IA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):959-72. PubMed ID: 15465215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimisation of radiotherapy for carcinoma of the parotid gland: a comparison of conventional, three-dimensional conformal, and intensity-modulated techniques.
Nutting CM; Rowbottom CG; Cosgrove VP; Henk JM; Dearnaley DP; Robinson MH; Conway J; Webb S
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Aug; 60(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 11439211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of beam weights in conformal radiotherapy planning of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: effects on therapeutic ratio.
De Gersem WR; Derycke S; De Wagter C; De Neve WC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Apr; 47(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 10758332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a quantitative index of beam modulation to characterize dose conformality: illustration by a comparison of full beamlet IMRT, few-segment IMRT (fsIMRT) and conformal unmodulated radiotherapy.
Webb S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(14):2051-62. PubMed ID: 12894969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated radiotherapy using the MIMiC multileaf collimator.
Chen Z; Xing L; Nath R
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2041-51. PubMed ID: 12349925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for oesophageal radiotherapy.
Nutting CM; Bedford JL; Cosgrove VP; Tait DM; Dearnaley DP; Webb S
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Nov; 61(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 11690681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing dose to the lungs through loosing target dose homogeneity requirement for radiotherapy of non small cell lung cancer.
Miao J; Yan H; Tian Y; Ma P; Liu Z; Li M; Ren W; Chen J; Zhang Y; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):169-176. PubMed ID: 29024297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]