247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15125007)
21. Improvements in target coverage and reduced spinal cord irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with carcinoma of the thyroid gland.
Nutting CM; Convery DJ; Cosgrove VP; Rowbottom C; Vini L; Harmer C; Dearnaley DP; Webb S
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Aug; 60(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 11439212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system.
Djajaputra D; Wu Q; Wu Y; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):3191-212. PubMed ID: 14579860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of IMRT optimization based on a pencil beam and a superposition algorithm.
Scholz C; Nill S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1909-13. PubMed ID: 12906209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of intensity-modulated field with a multileaf collimator.
Chui CS; Yorke E; Hong L
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1736-46. PubMed ID: 12906191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the helical tomotherapy against the multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiation modalities in lung cancer radiotherapy.
Mavroidis P; Shi C; Plataniotis GA; Delichas MG; Ferreira BC; Rodriguez S; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Br J Radiol; 2011 Feb; 84(998):161-72. PubMed ID: 20858664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Intensity modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator. Technique and clinical experience].
De Neve W; Claus F; Van Houtte P; Derycke S; De Wagter C
Cancer Radiother; 1999; 3(5):378-92. PubMed ID: 10572508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with conventional conformal radiotherapy for complex-shaped tumors.
Pirzkall A; Carol M; Lohr F; Höss A; Wannenmacher M; Debus J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1371-80. PubMed ID: 11121636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Conformal radiotherapy of challenging paraspinal tumors using a multiple arc segment technique.
Pirzkall A; Lohr F; Rhein B; Höss A; Schlegel W; Wannenmacher M; Debus J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Nov; 48(4):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11072179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An algorithm for systematic selection of beam directions for IMRT.
Gaede S; Wong E
Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 15000624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new algorithm for determining collimator angles that favor efficiency in MLC based IMRT delivery.
Wang D; Hill RW; Lam S
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1249-53. PubMed ID: 15191316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of the intensity levels and beam map resolutions on static IMRT plans.
Sun X; Xia P; Yu N
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2402-11. PubMed ID: 15487719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT.
Schreibmann E; Xing L
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2863-70. PubMed ID: 15543796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An isotoxic planning comparison study for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: is intensity-modulated radiotherapy the answer?
Warren M; Webster G; Ryder D; Rowbottom C; Faivre-Finn C
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2014 Aug; 26(8):461-7. PubMed ID: 24793504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of upper esophageal carcinoma.
Fu WH; Wang LH; Zhou ZM; Dai JR; Hu YM; Zhao LJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2004 Apr; 10(8):1098-102. PubMed ID: 15069706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pre-clinical evaluation of an inverse planning module for segmental MLC based IMRT delivery.
Georg D; Kroupa B
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Dec; 47(24):N303-14. PubMed ID: 12539982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer.
De Gersem W; Claus F; De Wagter C; De Neve W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(3):849-59. PubMed ID: 11699497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of beam intensity in a single step for IMRT inverse planning.
Chuang KS; Chen TJ; Kuo SC; Jan ML; Hwang IM; Chen S; Lin YC; Wu J
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):293-306. PubMed ID: 12608608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A quality and efficiency analysis of the IMFAST segmentation algorithm in head and neck "step & shoot" IMRT treatments.
Potter LD; Chang SX; Cullip TJ; Siochi AC
Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 11929009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The theoretical benefit of beam fringe compensation and field size reduction for iso-normal tissue complication probability dose escalation in radiotherapy of lung cancer.
Engelsman M; Remeijer P; van Herk M; Mijnheer B; Damen E
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Enhancement of IMRT delivery through MLC rotation.
Otto K; Clark BG
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Nov; 47(22):3997-4017. PubMed ID: 12476979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
