200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15125011)
1. Accounting for center-of-mass target motion using convolution methods in Monte Carlo-based dose calculations of the lung.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Balter JM; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):925-32. PubMed ID: 15125011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of breathing motion versus heterogeneity effects in lung cancer treatment planning.
Rosu M; Chetty IJ; Tatro DS; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1462-73. PubMed ID: 17500477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fluence convolution method to account for respiratory motion in three-dimensional dose calculations of the liver: a Monte Carlo study.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; Tyagi N; Marsh LH; McShan DL; Balter JM; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1776-80. PubMed ID: 12906195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose reconstruction in deforming lung anatomy: dose grid size effects and clinical implications.
Rosu M; Chetty IJ; Balter JM; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2487-95. PubMed ID: 16193778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel lung IMRT planning algorithms with nonuniform dose delivery strategy to account for respiratory motion.
Li X; Zhang P; Mah D; Gewanter R; Kutcher G
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3390-8. PubMed ID: 17022235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations.
Flampouri S; Jiang SB; Sharp GC; Wolfgang J; Patel AA; Choi NC
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2763-79. PubMed ID: 16723765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the diaphragm motion probability density function normally distributed?
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Ramakrishnan V; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 15789585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How extensive of a 4D dataset is needed to estimate cumulative dose distribution plan evaluation metrics in conformal lung therapy?
Rosu M; Balter JM; Chetty IJ; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Balter P; Ten Haken RK
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):233-45. PubMed ID: 17278509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online correction for respiratory motion: evaluation of two different imaging geometries.
Nill S; Unkelbach J; Dietrich L; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4087-96. PubMed ID: 16177532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method for the reconstruction of four-dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing.
Low DA; Nystrom M; Kalinin E; Parikh P; Dempsey JF; Bradley JD; Mutic S; Wahab SH; Islam T; Christensen G; Politte DG; Whiting BR
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1254-63. PubMed ID: 12852551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo-based lung cancer treatment planning incorporating PET-defined target volumes.
Chetty IJ; Fernando S; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Brooks C; Ten Haken RK; Kong FM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(4):65-76. PubMed ID: 16421501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The susceptibility of IMRT dose distributions to intrafraction organ motion: an investigation into smoothing filters derived from four dimensional computed tomography data.
Coolens C; Evans PM; Seco J; Webb S; Blackall JM; Rietzel E; Chen GT
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2809-18. PubMed ID: 16964857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhao Y; Qi G; Yin G; Wang X; Wang P; Li J; Xiao M; Li J; Kang S; Liao X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Dec; 9():287. PubMed ID: 25511623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of simple IMRT delivery techniques for non-small cell lung cancer patients with respiratory motion using 4DCT.
Reitz B; Parda DS; Colonias A; Lee V; Miften M
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 19410146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A computer simulated phantom study of tomotherapy dose optimization based on probability density functions (PDF) and potential errors caused by low reproducibility of PDF.
Sheng K; Cai J; Brookeman J; Molloy J; Christopher J; Read P
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3321-6. PubMed ID: 17022227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
