131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15125012)
1. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma.
Fedon C; Caballo M; García E; Diaz O; Boone JM; Dance DR; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1436-1447. PubMed ID: 33452822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging and breast cancer risk: a case-control study.
Hruska CB; Geske JR; Swanson TN; Mammel AN; Lake DS; Manduca A; Conners AL; Whaley DH; Scott CG; Carter RE; Rhodes DJ; O'Connor MK; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):46. PubMed ID: 29871661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI.
Lin M; Chan S; Chen JH; Chang D; Nie K; Chen ST; Lin CJ; Shih TC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 21361169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Packard N; Boone JM; Al-Mayah A; Brock KK; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3027-44. PubMed ID: 20463377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk.
Sovio U; Li J; Aitken Z; Humphreys K; Czene K; Moss S; Hall P; McCormack V; dos-Santos-Silva I
Br J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 110(7):1908-16. PubMed ID: 24556624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems.
Burton A; Byrnes G; Stone J; Tamimi RM; Heine J; Vachon C; Ozmen V; Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Scott C; Hipwell JH; Dickens C; Schüz J; Aribal ME; Bertrand K; Kwong A; Giles GG; Hopper J; Pérez Gómez B; Pollán M; Teo SH; Mariapun S; Taib NA; Lajous M; Lopez-Riduara R; Rice M; Romieu I; Flugelman AA; Ursin G; Qureshi S; Ma H; Lee E; Sirous R; Sirous M; Lee JW; Kim J; Salem D; Kamal R; Hartman M; Miao H; Chia KS; Nagata C; Vinayak S; Ndumia R; van Gils CH; Wanders JO; Peplonska B; Bukowska A; Allen S; Vinnicombe S; Moss S; Chiarelli AM; Linton L; Maskarinec G; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF; Dos-Santos-Silva I; McCormack VA
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):130. PubMed ID: 27993168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis guided Near Infrared Spectroscopy: Volumetric estimates of fibroglandular fraction and breast density from tomosynthesis reconstructions.
Vedantham S; Shi L; Michaelsen KE; Krishnaswamy V; Pogue BW; Poplack SP; Karellas A; Paulsen KD
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2015; 1(4):. PubMed ID: 26941961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association and Prediction Utilizing Craniocaudal and Mediolateral Oblique View Digital Mammography and Long-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Chen S; Tamimi RM; Colditz GA; Jiang S
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2023 Sep; 16(9):531-537. PubMed ID: 37428020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality.
Squires S; Harkness EF; Mackenzie A; Evans DG; Howell SJ; Astley SM
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38701765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality of DWI at breast MRI depends on the amount of fibroglandular tissue: implications for unenhanced screening.
Wielema M; Sijens PE; Pijnappel RM; De Bock GH; Zorgdrager M; Kok MGJ; Rainer E; Varga R; Clauser P; Oudkerk M; Dorrius MD; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38008743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The distribution of breast density in women aged 18 years and older.
Perera D; Pirikahu S; Walter J; Cadby G; Darcey E; Lloyd R; Hickey M; Saunders C; Hackmann M; Sampson DD; Shepherd J; Lilge L; Stone J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jun; 205(3):521-531. PubMed ID: 38498102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density.
Yaffe MJ
Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(3):209. PubMed ID: 18598375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a flexible versus a rigid breast compression paddle: pain experience, projected breast area, radiation dose and technical image quality.
Broeders MJ; Ten Voorde M; Veldkamp WJ; van Engen RE; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; 't Jong-Gunneman MN; de Win J; Greve KD; Paap E; den Heeten GJ
Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):821-9. PubMed ID: 25504427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased peri-ductal collagen micro-organization may contribute to raised mammographic density.
McConnell JC; O'Connell OV; Brennan K; Weiping L; Howe M; Joseph L; Knight D; O'Cualain R; Lim Y; Leek A; Waddington R; Rogan J; Astley SM; Gandhi A; Kirwan CC; Sherratt MJ; Streuli CH
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 26747277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bilateral symmetry of breast tissue composition by magnetic resonance in young women and adults.
Hennessey S; Huszti E; Gunasekura A; Salleh A; Martin L; Minkin S; Chavez S; Boyd NF
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Apr; 25(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 24477331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imaging breast adipose and fibroglandular tissue molecular signatures by using hybrid MRI-guided near-infrared spectral tomography.
Brooksby B; Pogue BW; Jiang S; Dehghani H; Srinivasan S; Kogel C; Tosteson TD; Weaver J; Poplack SP; Paulsen KD
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jun; 103(23):8828-33. PubMed ID: 16731633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting mammographic density with linear ultrasound transducers.
Behrens A; Fasching PA; Schwenke E; Gass P; Häberle L; Heindl F; Heusinger K; Lotz L; Lubrich H; Preuß C; Schneider MO; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stumpfe FM; Uder M; Wunderle M; Zahn AL; Hack CC; Beckmann MW; Emons J
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Sep; 28(1):384. PubMed ID: 37770952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of convolutional neural networks to breast biopsies to delineate tissue correlates of mammographic breast density.
Mullooly M; Ehteshami Bejnordi B; Pfeiffer RM; Fan S; Palakal M; Hada M; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Shepherd JA; Fan B; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Wang J; Malkov S; Johnson JM; Herschorn SD; Sprague BL; Hewitt S; Brinton LA; Karssemeijer N; van der Laak J; Beck A; Sherman ME; Gierach GL
NPJ Breast Cancer; 2019; 5():43. PubMed ID: 31754628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The incidence of breast cancer in Egyptian females in correlation to different mammographic ACR densities.
Salem MRH; Chalabi NAMT; Mohammed AAGB; Yacoub GEE
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2024 Apr; 66(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 38690816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
