BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15125150)

  • 1. Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Mar; 42(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 15125150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 14964567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
    Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local Binary Patterns Descriptor Based on Sparse Curvelet Coefficients for False-Positive Reduction in Mammograms.
    Pawar MM; Talbar SN; Dudhane A
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():5940436. PubMed ID: 30356422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):562-80. PubMed ID: 19816741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
    Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.
    Shen R; Yan K; Xiao F; Chang J; Jiang C; Zhou K
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):680-691. PubMed ID: 29582242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection.
    Rojas Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jun; 32(4):304-15. PubMed ID: 18358699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms using a modified holistically-nested edge detection network.
    Rampun A; López-Linares K; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Wang H; Ocaña IG; Maclair G; Zwiggelaar R; González Ballester MA; Macía I
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Oct; 57():1-17. PubMed ID: 31254729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic mass segmentation using fuzzy contours.
    Hmida M; Hamrouni K; Solaiman B; Boussetta S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():131-142. PubMed ID: 30195421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.