BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15125728)

  • 1. Pacing in high field cardiac magnetic resonance imaging:
    Nahrendorf M; Hiller KH; Hu K; Zeijlemaker V; Griswold M; Bauer WR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May; 27(5):671-4. PubMed ID: 15125728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.
    Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging for patients with permanent pacemakers: initial clinical experience.
    Goldsher D; Amikam S; Boulos M; Suleiman M; Shreiber R; Eran A; Goldshmid Y; Mazbar R; Roguin A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Feb; 8(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16544729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
    Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Fieno DS; Thomson LJ; Talavage TM; Berman DS
    Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The interference of electronic implants in low frequency electromagnetic fields.
    Silny J
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2003 Apr; 96 Spec No 3():30-4. PubMed ID: 12741329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe in cardiac pacemaker recipients?
    Del Ojo JL; Moya F; Villalba J; Sanz O; Pavón R; Garcia D; Pastor L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Apr; 28(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 15826258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and imaging quality of MRI in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease patients with pacemakers.
    Pulver AF; Puchalski MD; Bradley DJ; Minich LL; Su JT; Saarel EV; Whitaker P; Etheridge SP
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Apr; 32(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 19335853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging.
    Luechinger R; Zeijlemaker VA; Pedersen EM; Mortensen P; Falk E; Duru F; Candinas R; Boesiger P
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Feb; 26(4):376-83; discussion 325-7. PubMed ID: 15618060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Experimental and clinical investigations at 1.5 Tesla].
    Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Yang A; Nähle CP; Skowasch D; Meyer C; Schimpf R; Schild H; Sommer T
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):731-44. PubMed ID: 15871088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5 Tesla?
    Vahlhaus C; Sommer T; Lewalter T; Schimpf R; Schumacher B; Jung W; Lüderitz B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Apr; 24(4 Pt 1):489-95. PubMed ID: 11341087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance safety testing of a newly-developed fiber-optic cardiac pacing lead.
    Greatbatch W; Miller V; Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Jul; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 12112509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging of implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 tesla.
    Gimbel JR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 31(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 18684275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.
    Roguin A; Schwitter J; Vahlhaus C; Lombardi M; Brugada J; Vardas P; Auricchio A; Priori S; Sommer T
    Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 18308754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-tesla.
    Shellock FG; Fischer L; Fieno DS
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 17178677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implantable cardiac devices.
    Sierra M; Machado C
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2008; 9(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 19122581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical study of interference with cardiac pacemakers by a magnetic field at power line frequencies.
    Trigano A; Blandeau O; Souques M; Gernez JP; Magne I
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 45(6):896-900. PubMed ID: 15766826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [ECG changes caused by the effect of static magnetic fields of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography using magnets with a field power of 0.5 to 4.0 Telsa].
    Weikl A; Moshage W; Hentschel D; Schittenhelm R; Bachmann K
    Z Kardiol; 1989 Sep; 78(9):578-86. PubMed ID: 2815912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do induction cooktops interfere with cardiac pacemakers?
    Irnich W; Bernstein AD
    Europace; 2006 May; 8(5):377-84. PubMed ID: 16635999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.