These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15126066)

  • 21. Attentional effects on sensory tuning for single-feature detection and double-feature conjunction.
    Neri P
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3053-64. PubMed ID: 15474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
    Prime DJ; Ward LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images.
    Peters RJ; Iyer A; Itti L; Koch C
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2397-416. PubMed ID: 15935435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: the role of visual memory.
    Narasimhan S; Tripathy SP; Barrett BT
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 18930074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impaired filtering of behaviourally irrelevant visual information in dyslexia.
    Roach NW; Hogben JH
    Brain; 2007 Mar; 130(Pt 3):771-85. PubMed ID: 17237361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age-related differences in localized attentional interference.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR; Kramer AF
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 15065944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spatial interference between attended items engenders serial visual processing.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS; Mounts JR; Kramer AF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):229-43. PubMed ID: 23143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues.
    Gottlob LR
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 20045879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Mitchell JF; Stoner GR; Reynolds JH
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):410-3. PubMed ID: 15164062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision.
    Duncan J; Ward R; Shapiro K
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):313-5. PubMed ID: 8183369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selection-for-action in visual search.
    Hannus A; Cornelissen FW; Lindemann O; Bekkering H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):171-91. PubMed ID: 15627415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional processing of location and color cues during driving.
    Xia R; Fukushima M; Doi S; Kimura T; Miura T
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 50(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 19302271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional capacity limit for visual search causes spatial neglect in normal observers.
    Morgan MJ; Solomon JA
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1868-75. PubMed ID: 16430942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predicting visual search performance by quantifying stimuli similarities.
    Avraham T; Yeshurun Y; Lindenbaum M
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):9.1-22. PubMed ID: 18484848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.