These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1512659)

  • 21. [Normal and defective development of visual stimulus processing: psychophysical and electrophysiologic test results].
    Kau T; Boergen KP; Lorenz B
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 2086405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial vision deficits in infants and children with Down syndrome.
    John FM; Bromham NR; Woodhouse JM; Candy TR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 May; 45(5):1566-72. PubMed ID: 15111616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of visual impairment on measures of cognitive function for children with congenital toxoplasmosis: implications for compensatory intervention strategies.
    Roizen N; Kasza K; Karrison T; Mets M; Noble AG; Boyer K; Swisher C; Meier P; Remington J; Jalbrzikowski J; McLeod R; Kipp M; Rabiah P; Chamot D; Estes R; Cezar S; Mack D; Pfiffner L; Stein M; Danis B; Patel D; Hopkins J; Holfels E; Stein L; Withers S; Cameron A; Perkins J; Heydemann P
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e379-90. PubMed ID: 16864640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual Ability Score -- a new method to analyze ability in visually impaired children.
    Katsumi O; Chedid SG; Kronheim JK; Henry RK; Jones CM; Hirose T
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Feb; 76(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 9541434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comprehensive Evaluation of Visual Function in Patients With Orbital Fracture by Visual Electrophysiology and Visual Field Examination.
    Liu SR; Li M; He FL; Li ZK; Fan XQ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):188-192. PubMed ID: 29286999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.
    Hamilton R; Bach M; Heinrich SP; Hoffmann MB; Odom JV; McCulloch DL; Thompson DA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 142(1):25-74. PubMed ID: 32488810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sweep visual evoked potential testing as a predictor of recognition acuity in albinism.
    Bradfield YS; France TD; Verhoeve J; Gangnon RE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 125(5):628-33. PubMed ID: 17502501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP.
    Almoqbel F; Leat SJ; Irving E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 18761477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dietary essential fatty acid supply and visual acuity development.
    Birch EE; Birch DG; Hoffman DR; Uauy R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 33(11):3242-53. PubMed ID: 1399429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optical coherence tomography versus visual evoked potentials in detecting subclinical visual impairment in multiple sclerosis.
    Grecescu M
    J Med Life; 2014; 7(4):538-41. PubMed ID: 25713617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of methods for assessing visual function of infants.
    Prager TC; Zou YL; Jensen CL; Fraley JK; Anderson RE; Heird WC
    J AAPOS; 1999 Oct; 3(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 10532572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual hand display (VHD) as an introductory procedure for measuring vision in infants and young children with visual impairment.
    Kronheim JK; Katsumi O; Matsui Y; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1992; 29(5):305-11. PubMed ID: 1432518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A visual skills inventory for children with neurological impairments.
    McCulloch DL; Mackie RT; Dutton GN; Bradnam MS; Day RE; McDaid GJ; Phillips S; Napier A; Herbert AM; Saunders KJ; Shepherd AJ
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2007 Oct; 49(10):757-63. PubMed ID: 17880645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.
    Katsumi O; Denno S; Arai M; De Lopes Faria J; Hirose T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1997 Nov; 235(11):684-90. PubMed ID: 9407225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visually evoked potential (VEP) acuity: testability in a clinical pediatric population.
    Odom JV; Green M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1984 Dec; 62(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 6240884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual assessment of the multiply handicapped patient.
    Orel-Bixler D; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Hall A
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 66(8):530-6. PubMed ID: 2528103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Visual information processing and the mechanism of vision. Clinical application].
    Oguchi Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Dec; 102(12):850-75. PubMed ID: 10025116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.
    Strasser T; Nasser F; Langrová H; Zobor D; Lisowski Ł; Hillerkuss D; Sailer C; Kurtenbach A; Zrenner E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 138(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 30694438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.
    Kurtenbach A; Langrová H; Messias A; Zrenner E; Jägle H
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 126(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 23143759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring recovery of visual function in children with papilledema using sweep visual evoked potentials.
    Mezer E; Westall CA; Mirabella G; Wygnanski-Jaffe T; Yagev R; Buncic JR
    J AAPOS; 2016 Jun; 20(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 27164429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.