156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15127418)
1. Extra-target doses in children receiving multileaf collimator (MLC) based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
Koshy M; Paulino AC; Marcus RB; Ting JY; Whitaker D; Davis LW
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2004 Jun; 42(7):626-30. PubMed ID: 15127418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric comparison of three different involved nodal irradiation techniques for stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and three-dimensional proton radiotherapy.
Chera BS; Rodriguez C; Morris CG; Louis D; Yeung D; Li Z; Mendenhall NP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1173-80. PubMed ID: 19386423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation-induced cancers from modern radiotherapy techniques: intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus proton therapy.
Yoon M; Ahn SH; Kim J; Shin DH; Park SY; Lee SB; Shin KH; Cho KH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Aug; 77(5):1477-85. PubMed ID: 19879701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neck.
Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Le QT; Findley D; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 15093926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy.
Harsolia A; Kestin L; Grills I; Wallace M; Jolly S; Jones C; Lala M; Martinez A; Schell S; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1375-80. PubMed ID: 17544598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measured peripheral dose in pediatric radiation therapy: a comparison of intensity-modulated and conformal techniques.
Mansur DB; Klein EE; Maserang BP
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17257700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-modulated radiation treatment for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma--the University of Iowa experience.
Yao M; Dornfeld KJ; Buatti JM; Skwarchuk M; Tan H; Nguyen T; Wacha J; Bayouth JE; Funk GF; Smith RB; Graham SM; Chang K; Hoffman HT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 16168834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison.
Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems.
Das IJ; Cheng CW; Chopra KL; Mitra RK; Srivastava SP; Glatstein E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Mar; 100(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 18314476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison between 3DCRT and IMRT using different multileaf collimators in the treatment of brain tumors.
Ding M; Newman F; Chen C; Stuhr K; Gaspar LE
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19181248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is intensity-modulated radiotherapy better than conventional radiation treatment and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for mediastinal masses in patients with Hodgkin's disease, and is there a role for beam orientation optimization and dose constraints assigned to virtual volumes?
Girinsky T; Pichenot C; Beaudre A; Ghalibafian M; Lefkopoulos D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 16169675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in dose homogeneity with electronic tissue compensation over IMRT and conventional RT in whole brain radiotherapy.
Goyal S; Yue NJ; Millevoi R; Kagan E; Haffty B; Narra V
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Aug; 88(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 18362037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An imrt technique to increase therapeutic ratio of breast irradiation in patients with early-stage left breast cancer: limiting second malignancies.
Ahmed RS; De Los Santos JF; Fiveash JB; Keene KS; Popple RA
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 18262126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
