BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15128215)

  • 1. Investigation of the effects of microbubble shell disruption on population scattering and implications for modeling contrast agent behavior.
    Chien CT; Burns PN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Mar; 51(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 15128215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radial modulation of single microbubbles.
    Emmer M; Vos HJ; Versluis M; de Jong N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2370-9. PubMed ID: 19942524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interaction of a high-order Bessel beam with a submerged spherical ultrasound contrast agent shell - Scattering theory.
    Mitri FG
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Mar; 50(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 19833370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative measurement of ultrasound disruption of polymer-shelled microbubbles.
    Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Tickner EG; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1777-86. PubMed ID: 17656011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.
    Lampaskis M; Averkiou M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 20045592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical and experimental characterisation of magnetic microbubbles.
    Mulvana H; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX; Pankhurst Q; Stride E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):864-75. PubMed ID: 22480944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal design and experimental investigation of surfactant encapsulated microbubbles.
    Zong Y; Wan M; Wang S; Zhang G
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e119-22. PubMed ID: 16859725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study on the multiple scattering effects of ultrasound contrast agents.
    Chen J; Zhu Z
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e115-8. PubMed ID: 16854444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
    Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling photothermal and acoustical induced microbubble generation and growth.
    Krasovitski B; Kislev H; Kimmel E
    Ultrasonics; 2007 Dec; 47(1-4):90-101. PubMed ID: 17910969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stability of an encapsulated bubble shell.
    Krasovitski B; Kimmel E
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Feb; 44(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 16388834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic bubbles in medicine: influence of the shell.
    Postema M; Schmitz G
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2007 Apr; 14(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 17218145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles.
    Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18343022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of nonlinear propagation in ultrasound contrast agent imaging.
    Tang MX; Kamiyama N; Eckersley RJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 36(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 20133035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
    Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental investigations of nonlinearities and destruction mechanisms of an experimental phospholipid-based ultrasound contrast agent.
    Casciaro S; Palmizio Errico R; Conversano F; Demitri C; Distante A
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17220727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Sijl J; Dollet B; Overvelde M; Garbin V; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3239-52. PubMed ID: 21110619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear shell behavior of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.
    Overvelde M; Garbin V; Sijl J; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 36(12):2080-92. PubMed ID: 21030140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual high-frequency difference excitation for contrast detection.
    Yeh CK; Su SY; Shen CC; Li ML
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2164-76. PubMed ID: 18986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures.
    Emmer M; Vos HJ; Goertz DE; van Wamel A; Versluis M; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 18829153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.