174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15128990)
1. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable?
Revel MP; Bissery A; Bienvenu M; Aycard L; Lefort C; Frija G
Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 15128990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation.
Revel MP; Lefort C; Bissery A; Bienvenu M; Aycard L; Chatellier G; Frija G
Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):459-66. PubMed ID: 15128991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis.
Johnsson ÅA; Fagman E; Vikgren J; Fisichella VA; Boijsen M; Flinck A; Kheddache S; Svalkvist A; Båth M
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):273-82. PubMed ID: 22993220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance.
Gietema HA; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Mali WP; Groenewegen G; Prokop M
Radiology; 2007 Dec; 245(3):888-94. PubMed ID: 17923508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement.
Ko JP; Chang J; Bomsztyk E; Babb JS; Naidich DP; Rusinek H
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 16126923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements.
Goodman LR; Gulsun M; Washington L; Nagy PG; Piacsek KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Apr; 186(4):989-94. PubMed ID: 16554568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of small pulmonary nodules using direct digital radiography and picture archiving and communication systems.
Wu N; Gamsu G; Czum J; Held B; Thakur R; Nicola G
J Thorac Imaging; 2006 Mar; 21(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16538152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MDCT of right ventricular function: impact of methodologic approach in estimation of right ventricular ejection fraction, part 2.
Remy-Jardin M; Delhaye D; Teisseire A; Hossein-Foucher C; Duhamel A; Remy J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1605-9. PubMed ID: 17114557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDG-PET/CT characterization of adrenal nodules: diagnostic accuracy and interreader agreement using quantitative and qualitative methods.
Evans PD; Miller CM; Marin D; Stinnett SS; Wong TZ; Paulson EK; Ho LM
Acad Radiol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):923-9. PubMed ID: 23830599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening.
Gierada DS; Pilgram TK; Ford M; Fagerstrom RM; Church TR; Nath H; Garg K; Strollo DC
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):265-72. PubMed ID: 18024436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT.
Kostis WJ; Yankelevitz DF; Reeves AP; Fluture SC; Henschke CI
Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 15128989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection.
Rubin GD; Lyo JK; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Chow LC; Leung AN; Mindelzun R; Schraedley-Desmond PK; Zinck SE; Naidich DP; Napel S
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):274-83. PubMed ID: 15537839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: agreement among radiologists.
Leader JK; Warfel TE; Fuhrman CR; Golla SK; Weissfeld JL; Avila RS; Turner WD; Zheng B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):973-8. PubMed ID: 16177418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data.
Peloschek P; Sailer J; Weber M; Herold CJ; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):561-9. PubMed ID: 17456878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements.
Gietema HA; Wang Y; Xu D; van Klaveren RJ; de Koning H; Scholten E; Verschakelen J; Kohl G; Oudkerk M; Prokop M
Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):251-7. PubMed ID: 16908677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the assessment of pulmonary nodule size on CT using film and computer display methods.
Bogot NR; Kazerooni EA; Kelly AM; Quint LE; Desjardins B; Nan B
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):948-56. PubMed ID: 16087090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Operator-dependent reproducibility of size measurements of small phantoms and lung nodules examined with low-dose thin-section computed tomography.
Picozzi G; Diciotti S; Falchini M; Foresti S; Gallesi F; Cavigli E; Livi L; Villari N; Mascalchi M
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):831-9. PubMed ID: 17035874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of MDCT in characterizing pulmonary venous drainage, diameter and distance to first bifurcation: an interobserver study.
Cronin P; Kelly AM; Gross BH; Desjardins B; Patel S; Kazerooni EA; Carlos RC
Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 17368213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coronal multiplanar reconstruction view from whole lung thin-section CT by multidetector-row CT: determination of malignant or benign lesions and differential diagnosis in 68 cases of solitary pulmonary nodule.
Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Honda O; Koyama M; Murai S; Inoue A; Sumikawa H; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Yamamoto S; Nakamura H; Kudo M
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):267-71. PubMed ID: 14743900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Software volumetric evaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules.
Revel MP; Merlin A; Peyrard S; Triki R; Couchon S; Chatellier G; Frija G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 16794167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
