These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15129107)

  • 21. Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.
    Beck RL; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Ketterer MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 38509805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Straight versus modiolar hugging electrodes: does one perform better than the other?
    Doshi J; Johnson P; Mawman D; Green K; Bruce IA; Freeman S; Lloyd SK
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 25415467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech Perception Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Lateral Wall or Perimodiolar Array.
    Moran M; Vandali A; Briggs RJS; Dettman S; Cowan RSC; Dowell RC
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 31083082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study.
    Sainz M; Garcia-Valdecasas J; Ballesteros JM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1044-8. PubMed ID: 19395988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Otosclerosis: selection of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Matterson AG; O'Leary S; Pinder D; Freidman L; Dowell R; Briggs R
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 17468676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.
    Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Early Outcomes With a Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.
    McJunkin JL; Durakovic N; Herzog J; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e28-e33. PubMed ID: 29227449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.
    James C; Albegger K; Battmer R; Burdo S; Deggouj N; Deguine O; Dillier N; Gersdorff M; Laszig R; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Mondain M; Offeciers E; Macías AR; Ramsden R; Sterkers O; Von Wallenberg E; Weber B; Fraysse B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 16092537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
    Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative Performance of Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays.
    Sturm JJ; Patel V; Dibelius G; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Apr; 42(4):532-539. PubMed ID: 33710993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
    van Weert S; Stokroos RJ; Rikers MM; van Dijk P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.
    Alfelasi M; Piron JP; Mathiolon C; Lenel N; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 May; 270(6):1809-15. PubMed ID: 23053370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear implantation via the middle fossa approach: surgical and programming considerations.
    Bento RF; Bittencourt AG; Goffi-Gomez MV; Samuel P; Tsuji RK; de Brito R
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1516-24. PubMed ID: 23150094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
    Cuda D; Murri A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner.
    van der Beek FB; Boermans PP; Verbist BM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16377994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.