These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15129280)

  • 1. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.
    Fedorka KM; Mousseau TA
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6987):65-7. PubMed ID: 15129280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.
    Collet JM; Dean RF; Worley K; Richardson DS; Pizzari T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 May; 281(1782):20132973. PubMed ID: 24648220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nuptial gifts fail to resolve a sexual conflict in an insect.
    Wedell N; Tregenza T; Simmons LW
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 8():204. PubMed ID: 18627603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bite force, body size, and octopamine mediate mating interactions in the house cricket (Acheta domesticus).
    Adeola F; Lailvaux S
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Oct; 36(10):1494-1502. PubMed ID: 37737492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial structure could explain the maintenance of alternative reproductive tactics in tree cricket males.
    Sadiq MA; Bhat AS; Guttal V; Balakrishnan R
    Biol Open; 2024 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 38738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetically regulated temporal variation of novel courtship elements in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala.
    Fergus DJ; Decarvalho TN; Shaw KL
    Behav Genet; 2011 Jul; 41(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 20878226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance-based selection may explain general mating patterns in social insects.
    Rueppell O; Johnson N; Rychtár J
    Biol Lett; 2008 Jun; 4(3):270-3. PubMed ID: 18364307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digest: When sexual selection hits the wall of natural selection.
    O'Loughlin BS; Marcondes RS
    Evolution; 2024 Jul; 78(7):1347-1348. PubMed ID: 38716650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the benefits of clarifying the meaning of "plant gender".
    Oberle B; Fairchild E
    Am J Bot; 2023 Jul; 110(7):e16196. PubMed ID: 37269498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dominance reversals: the resolution of genetic conflict and maintenance of genetic variation.
    Grieshop K; Ho EKH; Kasimatis KR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Mar; 291(2018):20232816. PubMed ID: 38471544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An unbiased test reveals no enrichment of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms on the human X chromosome.
    Ruzicka F; Connallon T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Jan; 289(1967):20212314. PubMed ID: 35078366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evolution reveals sex-specific dominance for surviving bacterial infection in laboratory populations of
    Geeta Arun M; Agarwala A; Syed ZA; Jigisha ; Kashyap M; Venkatesan S; Chechi TS; Gupta V; Prasad NG
    Evol Lett; 2021 Dec; 5(6):657-671. PubMed ID: 34919096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.
    Ruzicka F; Connallon T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Oct; 287(1937):20201869. PubMed ID: 33081608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The search for sexually antagonistic genes: Practical insights from studies of local adaptation and statistical genomics.
    Ruzicka F; Dutoit L; Czuppon P; Jordan CY; Li XY; Olito C; Runemark A; Svensson EI; Yazdi HP; Connallon T
    Evol Lett; 2020 Oct; 4(5):398-415. PubMed ID: 33014417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.
    Grieshop K; Arnqvist G
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(12):e2006810. PubMed ID: 30533008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life-history consequences of bidirectional selection for male morph in a male-dimorphic bulb mite.
    Van den Beuken TPG; Smallegange IM
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2018 Dec; 76(4):435-452. PubMed ID: 30421131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Divergent artificial selection for female reproductive investment has a sexually concordant effect on male reproductive success.
    Pick JL; Hutter P; Tschirren B
    Evol Lett; 2017 Sep; 1(4):222-228. PubMed ID: 30283651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?
    Svensson EI; Goedert D; Gómez-Llano MA; Spagopoulou F; Nava-Bolaños A; Booksmythe I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.
    De Lisle SP; Goedert D; Reedy AM; Svensson EI
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 373(1757):. PubMed ID: 30150216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Macroevolutionary consequences of sexual conflict.
    Hermansen JS; Starrfelt J; Voje KL; Stenseth NC
    Biol Lett; 2018 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 29875207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.