These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15129486)

  • 1. [Burden of proof in medical cases--presumption of fact and prima facie evidence. II. Presumption of fact and prima facie evidence].
    Sliwka M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 15129486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Burden of proof in medical cases--presumption of fact and prima facie evidence. 1. Burden of proof].
    Sliwka M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15129485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The prima facie proof: evidence in a nursing liability suit].
    Grosskopf V
    Pflege Z; 1999 Jun; 52(6):430-1. PubMed ID: 10562131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Medical and legal aspects of inability to participate in legal proceedings and the execution of imprisonment resulting from mental illness].
    Teleśnicki SM; Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15129487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The prima facie tort rule: a possible medical-legal answer to the medical malpractice crisis.
    Schussler T
    N Y State J Med; 1989 Jul; 89(7):399-402. PubMed ID: 2761868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The state of forensic medical expertise of civil cases concerning medical disputes].
    Barinov EKh; Romodanovskiĭ PO
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2013; 56(6):37-40. PubMed ID: 25474920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The notion and classification of expert errors].
    Klevno VA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2012; 55(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 22686055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The court expert and his opinion in legal proceedings].
    Szmidt W
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 17691174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Legal aspects of the health care institution liability for nosocomial infections].
    Garus-Pakowska A; Szatko F; Pakowski M
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19928434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Position and role of the court expert in the light of expectations of the legal proceedings agency].
    Piotrowska I
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 17691175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A report of an accident investigation commission as evidence in legal proceedings].
    Widła T; Leśniak M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 22117493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Expert's opinion in civil proceedings for damages in cases relating to hospital infections, especially to hepatitis B and C infections].
    Chowaniec C
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 16498962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Res Ipsa Loquitur: a step along the road to liability without fault.
    Haag K
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Feb; (310):9-28. PubMed ID: 15807402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Medico-legal opinions in penal cases provided by clinicians and forensic medicine specialists--comparative analysis].
    Chowaniec C; Chowaniec M; Nowak A
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16498963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Remarks about the position of the medico-legal expert in imperative regulations in the Penal and Civil Codes].
    Chowaniec C; Nowak A; Chowaniec M; Kobek M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 16498966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The expert witness. Neither Frye nor Daubert solved the problem: what can be done?
    Kaufman HH
    Sci Justice; 2001; 41(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 11215302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the civil procedure rules on clinical negligence claims.
    Mayberry MK
    Postgrad Med J; 2003 Feb; 79(928):74-7. PubMed ID: 12612319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert witness malfeasance: how should specialty societies respond?
    Feld AD; Carey WD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 15842567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Significance of knowledge about typicality in medico-legal opinionating].
    Nasiłowski W
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 22117483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Legal aspects of medical expert testimony and non-economic damage in civil liability of physician].
    Pauković H
    Lijec Vjesn; 2008; 130(11-12):288-93. PubMed ID: 19146186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.