These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15129743)

  • 1. Probe distractors can influence negative priming by perceptual grouping.
    Yeh YY; Chao HF
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 15129743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting the role of probe distractors in negative priming: location negative priming is observed when probe distractors are consistently absent.
    Chao HF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1072-82. PubMed ID: 19525538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where has all the inhibition gone? Insights from electrophysiological measures into negative priming without probe distractors.
    Groh-Bordin C; Frings C
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 19619926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional demand and memory retrieval in negative priming.
    Chao HF; Yeh YY
    Psychol Res; 2008 May; 72(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17206450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual grouping and visual selective attention.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Aug; 60(6):1004-21. PubMed ID: 9718959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative priming and perceptual fluency: more than what meets the eye.
    Grison S; Strayer DL
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):1063-71. PubMed ID: 11578050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociations between identity and location negative priming.
    Chao HF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 21075358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the robustness of prime response retrieval processes: evidence from auditory negative priming without probe interference.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):335-57. PubMed ID: 23799324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased perceptual and conceptual processing difficulty makes the immeasurable measurable: negative priming in the absence of probe distractors.
    Frings C; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 21077720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object-based perceptual grouping affects negative priming.
    Fuentes LJ; Humphreys GW; Agis IF; Carmona E; Catena A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):664-72. PubMed ID: 9554102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7991353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Determinants of occurrence of negative priming for novel shapes with matching paradigm].
    Endo N; Saiki J; Saito H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Aug; 72(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11697274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the control of single-prime negative priming: the effects of practice and time course.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1286-95. PubMed ID: 19686021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism.
    Guy S; Buckolz E; Pratt J
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 14959501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors.
    Frings C; Wentura D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):854-64. PubMed ID: 16846284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative priming with masked distractor-only prime trials: awareness moderates negative priming.
    Frings C; Wentura D
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15850160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm.
    Richards A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):449-63. PubMed ID: 10428686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibitory mechanisms of attention: locus, stability, and relationship with distractor interference effects.
    Tipper SP; Weaver B; Kirkpatrick J; Lewis S
    Br J Psychol; 1991 Nov; 82 ( Pt 4)():507-20. PubMed ID: 1782519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target localization among concurrent sound sources: no evidence for the inhibition of previous distractor responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):132-44. PubMed ID: 23077027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional inhibition in patients with focal frontal lobe lesions.
    McDonald CR; Bauer RM; Filoteo JV; Grande L; Roper SN; Gilmore R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 May; 27(4):485-503. PubMed ID: 15962693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.