These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15130044)

  • 1. Variation in the cranial base orientation and facial skeleton in dry skulls sampled from three major populations.
    Kuroe K; Rosas A; Molleson T
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Apr; 26(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 15130044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in African, Asian and European populations and its relationship with different malocclusions.
    Rosas A; Bastir M; Alarcón JA; Kuroe K
    Arch Oral Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(9):826-34. PubMed ID: 18359003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between cranial base structure and maxillofacial components in children aged 3-5 years.
    Tanabe Y; Taguchi Y; Noda T
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 12001554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How does occipitalization influence the dimensions of the cranium?
    Caspersen LM; Kjaer I; Sonnesen L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Aug; 13(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 20618718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphological differences in the craniofacial structure between Japanese and Caucasian girls with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Ishii N; Deguchi T; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Feb; 24(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 11887380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethnic differences in craniofacial and upper spine morphology in children with skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Oh E; Ahn SJ; Sonnesen L
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 29337630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional variation of craniofacial structures in relation to changing masticatory-functional demands.
    Varrela J
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 14(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 1563473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
    Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.
    Alcalde RE; Jinno T; Pogrel MA; Matsumura T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9461133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial Pattern I, II and III.
    Thiesen G; Pletsch G; Zastrow MD; do Valle CV; do Valle-Corotti KM; Patel MP; Conti PC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23876952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphological relationship between the cranial base and dentofacial complex obtained by reconstructive computer tomographic images.
    Hayashi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 12938845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlated variation between the lateral basicranium and the face: a geometric morphometric study in different human groups.
    Bastir M; Rosas A
    Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(9):814-24. PubMed ID: 16681992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mesh diagram analysis: developing a norm for African Americans.
    Faustini MM; Hale C; Cisneros GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9107376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study between medieval (12th -14th c.) and modern skulls samples of five cranio-facial measures].
    Esclassan R; Noirrit E; Guyonnet JJ; Lodter C
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2006 Feb; 107(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16523172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Neolithic transition in Europe and North Africa. The functional craneology contribution.
    Sardi ML; Ramírez Rozzi F; Pucciarelli HM
    Anthropol Anz; 2004 Jun; 62(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 15228192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parental craniofacial cephalometric features of Chinese patients with nonsyndromic isolated cleft palate.
    Lu D; Shi B; Chen H; Zeng Q; Wu J; Li Y; Meng T; He X; Zheng Q
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1014-21. PubMed ID: 19596554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between cranial base and maxillo-facial morphology in Egyptian children.
    El-Batran M; Soliman N; El-Wakil Kh
    Homo; 2008; 59(4):287-300. PubMed ID: 18707682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship of upper facial proportions and the plane of occlusion to anatomic reference planes.
    Ow RK; Djeng SK; Ho CK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 2724167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A morphometric analysis of the craniofacial configuration in achondroplasia.
    Cohen MM; Walker GF; Phillips C
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol Suppl; 1985; 1():139-65. PubMed ID: 3877092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.