These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15130712)

  • 1. [French version of structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines and first studies of validation].
    Fayol P; Carrière H; Habonimana D; Preux PM; Dumond JJ
    Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2004 May; 47(4):142-56. PubMed ID: 15130712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
    Wilson JT; Edwards P; Fiddes H; Stewart E; Teasdale GM
    J Neurotrauma; 2002 Sep; 19(9):999-1005. PubMed ID: 12482113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the Oxford Handicap Scale at hospital discharge to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Perel P; Edwards P; Shakur H; Roberts I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Nov; 8():72. PubMed ID: 18990202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews.
    Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2003; 18(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 12802167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosing psychotic disorders: validity, reliability and applications of the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis (DIP). Italian version.
    Rossi A; Morgan V; Amaddeo F; Sandri M; Grigoletti L; Maggioni F; Ferro A; Rigon E; Donisi V; Venturi VV; Goria F; Skre I; Tansella M; Jablensky A
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2010; 19(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 20486422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The German version of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity in a psychiatric patient sample.
    Grabe HJ; Löbel S; Dittrich D; Bagby RM; Taylor GJ; Quilty LC; Spitzer C; Barnow S; Mathier F; Jenewein J; Freyberger HJ; Rufer M
    Compr Psychiatry; 2009; 50(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 19683612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-rater reliability of the French version of the core index for melancholia.
    Thuile J; Even C; Friedman S; Guelfi JD
    J Affect Disord; 2005 Oct; 88(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 16122809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.
    Whyte J; Hart T; Ellis CA; Chervoneva I
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):966-73. PubMed ID: 18452747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and reliability study of the Thai version of WHO schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry: sections on psychotic disorders.
    Paholpak S; Arunpongpaisal S; Krisanaprakornkit T; Khiewyoo J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Mar; 91(3):408-16. PubMed ID: 18575297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of a telephone-based Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment using a structured interview in a heterogenous population of patients and examiners.
    LeGrand SA; Hindman BJ; Dexter F; Moss LG; Todd MM
    J Neurotrauma; 2007 Sep; 24(9):1437-46. PubMed ID: 17892406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use.
    Wilson JT; Pettigrew LE; Teasdale GM
    J Neurotrauma; 1998 Aug; 15(8):573-85. PubMed ID: 9726257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Validation of the french translated Richmond vigilance-agitation scale].
    Chanques G; Jaber S; Barbotte E; Verdier R; Henriette K; Lefrant JY; Eledjam JJ
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Jul; 25(7):696-701. PubMed ID: 16698231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of the abbreviated injury score and the injury severity score in comparison to the Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury.
    Foreman BP; Caesar RR; Parks J; Madden C; Gentilello LM; Shafi S; Carlile MC; Harper CR; Diaz-Arrastia RR
    J Trauma; 2007 Apr; 62(4):946-50. PubMed ID: 17426553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The neurobehavioral rating scale-revised: assessment of concurrent validity].
    Soury S; Mazaux JM; Lambert J; De Seze M; Joseph PA; Lozes-Boudillon S; McCauley S; Vanier M; Levin HS
    Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 48(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 15748770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-rater agreement on assessment of outcome within a trauma registry.
    Ekegren CL; Hart MJ; Brown A; Gabbe BJ
    Injury; 2016 Jan; 47(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 26304002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for reducing misclassification in the extended Glasgow Outcome Score.
    Lu J; Marmarou A; Lapane K; Turf E; Wilson L; ;
    J Neurotrauma; 2010 May; 27(5):843-52. PubMed ID: 20334503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observer variation in the assessment of outcome in traumatic brain injury: experience from a multicenter, international randomized clinical trial.
    Wilson JT; Slieker FJ; Legrand V; Murray G; Stocchetti N; Maas AI
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Jul; 61(1):123-8; discussion 128-9. PubMed ID: 17621027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec.
    Cyr M; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2009 May; 33(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 19481261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.
    Melikoglu MA; Kocabas H; Sezer I; Bilgilisoy M; Tuncer T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):E219-24. PubMed ID: 19282728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care.
    Morriss R; Leese M; Chatwin J; Baldwin D;
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Dec; 111(2-3):204-13. PubMed ID: 18374987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.