These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15130870)

  • 1. Effects of response priming and inhibition on movement planning and execution.
    Welsh TN; Elliot D
    J Mot Behav; 2004 Jun; 36(2):200-11. PubMed ID: 15130870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of response priming on the planning and execution of goal-directed movements in the presence of a distracting stimulus.
    Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jun; 119(2):123-42. PubMed ID: 15877977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of attending to multiple locations on eye movements.
    Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):1921-7. PubMed ID: 15820510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention and selection for predictive smooth pursuit eye movements.
    Poliakoff E; Collins CJ; Barnes GR
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):688-700. PubMed ID: 16243495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probing the time course of facilitation and inhibition in gaze cueing of attention in an upper-limb reaching task.
    Yoxon E; Constable MD; Welsh TN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2410-2423. PubMed ID: 31338823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations.
    Pestilli F; Carrasco M
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1867-75. PubMed ID: 15797776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease.
    Couette M; Bachoud-Levi AC; Brugieres P; Sieroff E; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC; Khoe W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncued and cued dynamics measured by response classification.
    Shimozaki SS
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):10. PubMed ID: 20884585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of multiple irrelevant visual events at the same spatial location on inhibition.
    Visser TA; Barnes D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 19304628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence from a response choice task reveals a selection bias in the attentional cueing paradigm.
    Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Nov; 126(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 17280639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-down influences make saccades deviate away: the case of endogenous cues.
    Van der Stigchel S; Meeter M; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 17022930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between attentional capture and deviations in movement trajectories in a selective reaching task.
    Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 21507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contextual cueing effects despite spatially cued target locations.
    Schankin A; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):717-27. PubMed ID: 20230499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between covert and overt attention in endogenous cuing.
    Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jul; 69(5):719-31. PubMed ID: 17929695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues.
    Friesen CK; Ristic J; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):319-29. PubMed ID: 15053691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: is it related to inhibition of return?
    Mele S; Savazzi S; Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 18206184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.