168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15131784)
1. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Atkin W; Rogers P; Cardwell C; Cook C; Cuzick J; Wardle J; Edwards R
Gastroenterology; 2004 May; 126(5):1247-56. PubMed ID: 15131784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates.
Thomas-Gibson S; Rogers P; Cooper S; Man R; Rutter MD; Suzuki N; Swain D; Thuraisingam A; Atkin W
Endoscopy; 2006 May; 38(5):456-60. PubMed ID: 16767579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.
Bretthauer M; Skovlund E; Grotmol T; Thiis-Evensen E; Gondal G; Huppertz-Hauss G; Efskind P; Hofstad B; Thorp Holmsen S; Eide TJ; Hoff G
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2003 Dec; 38(12):1268-74. PubMed ID: 14750648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Higher Adenoma Detection Rates at Screening Associated With Lower Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.
Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Saunders BP; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Feb; 20(2):e148-e167. PubMed ID: 32931959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a video assessment scoring method to determine the accuracy of endoscopist performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Thomas-Gibson S; Rogers PA; Suzuki N; Vance ME; Rutter MD; Swain D; Nicholls AJ; Saunders BP; Atkin W
Endoscopy; 2006 Mar; 38(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 16528646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the multiple components of the variability in the adenoma detection rate in sigmoidoscopy screening, and lessons for training.
Fracchia M; Senore C; Armaroli P; Ferraris R; Placido RD; Musso A; Turco D; Bellisario C; Baldi I; Segnan N
Endoscopy; 2010 Jun; 42(6):448-55. PubMed ID: 20414864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexible sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO cancer screening trial: results from the baseline screening examination of a randomized trial.
Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Pinsky PF; Bresalier RS; Church T; Yurgalevitch S; Austin JH; Prorok PC; Gohagan JK;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jul; 97(13):989-97. PubMed ID: 15998952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting adenoma detection rate in a national flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme: a retrospective analysis.
Bevan R; Blanks RG; Nickerson C; Saunders BP; Stebbing J; Tighe R; Veitch AM; Garrett W; Rees CJ
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 4(3):239-247. PubMed ID: 30655218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy by nonphysician endoscopists.
Wallace MB; Kemp JA; Meyer F; Horton K; Reffel A; Christiansen CL; Farraye FA
Am J Med; 1999 Sep; 107(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10492313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between detection of adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy and interval distal colorectal cancer.
Rogal SS; Pinsky PF; Schoen RE
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 22902761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the randomised US PLCO cancer screening trial.
Miller EA; Pinsky PF; Schoen RE; Prorok PC; Church TR
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 4(2):101-110. PubMed ID: 30502933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.
Do A; Weinberg J; Kakkar A; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 23211748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of endoscopist performance and patient factors on distal adenoma detection and colorectal cancer incidence.
Power S; Wooldrage K; Saunders BP; Cross AJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):44. PubMed ID: 38262960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.
Brenner H; Altenhofen L; Kretschmann J; Rösch T; Pox C; Stock C; Hoffmeister M
Gastroenterology; 2015 Aug; 149(2):356-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25911510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing.
Bretagne JF; Hamonic S; Piette C; Manfredi S; Leray E; Durand G; Riou F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Feb; 71(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 19922930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopists with low adenoma detection rates benefit from high-definition endoscopy.
Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Gessl I; Heinze G; Salzl P; Sallinger D; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch A; Ferlitsch M
Surg Endosc; 2015 Feb; 29(2):466-73. PubMed ID: 25005016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
