197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15131933)
1. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Goyal M; Nicol J; Gandhi D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2004 Apr; 55(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15131933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis.
Hathout GM; Duh MJ; El-Saden SM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Oct; 24(9):1747-56. PubMed ID: 14561597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses over 70% reliably detectable?].
Aschenbach R; Eger C; Basche S; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2004 Mar; 176(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 15026949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
Slosman F; Stolpen AH; Lexa FJ; Schnall MD; Langlotz CP; Carpenter JP; Goldberg HI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Feb; 170(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 9456971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using fluoroscopic monitoring of contrast arrival: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
Butz B; Dorenbeck U; Borisch I; Zorger N; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S; Link J
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 15191100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.
Young GR; Humphrey PR; Shaw MD; Nixon TE; Smith ET
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 57(12):1466-78. PubMed ID: 7798975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in renal artery stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Law YM; Tay KH; Gan YU; Cheah FK; Tan BS
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Apr; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 18382021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Chiras J; Dormont D; Marsault C
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
