BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15132442)

  • 21. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
    Zierhut EC; Joondeph DR; Artun J; Little RM
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):208-19. PubMed ID: 10926430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Profile changes following extraction orthodontic treatment: A comparison of first versus second premolar extraction.
    Omar Z; Short L; Banting DW; Saltaji H
    Int Orthod; 2018 Mar; 16(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 29478932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of first premolars extraction on vertical dimension in Italian patients with a Class I normo-divergent malocclusion. A retrospective study.
    Greco M; Fichera G; Barbato E; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 20545094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cephalometric evaluation of symmetric and asymmetric extraction treatment for patients with Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson G; Carvalho PE; Cançado RH; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17628247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension.
    Kim TK; Kim JT; Mah J; Yang WS; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 15825779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults.
    Uysal T; Yagci A; Basciftci FA; Sisman Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 19482876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of computerized video imaging in predicting adult extraction treatment outcomes.
    Le TN; Sameshima GT; Grubb JE; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 9770096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Soft tissue facial profile of normal dental and skeletal subjects in Croatian population aged 12 to 15 years.
    Lapter Varga M; Anić Milosević S; Vusić A; Slaj M; Varga S; Perinić M; Slaj M
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):523-8. PubMed ID: 18756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
    Lin PT; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the bionator.
    Lange DW; Kalra V; Broadbent BH; Powers M; Nelson S
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 8702068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips.
    Wholley CJ; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 12940559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.
    Janson G; Camardella LT; Araki JD; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20620829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Leon-Salazar V; Leon-Salazar R; Janson M; de Freitas MR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 19651339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in the soft tissue facial profile following orthodontic extractions: a geometric morphometric study.
    Singh GD; Maldonado L; Thind BS
    Funct Orthod; 2004 Winter-2005 Spring; 22(1):34-8, 40. PubMed ID: 16044748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.