323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15132443)
1. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
Kim KR; Muhl ZF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy.
Cope JB; Buschang PH; Cope DD; Parker J; Blackwood HO
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 8010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
Waters D; Harris EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sagittal mandibular changes with overbite correction in subjects with different mandibular growth directions: late mixed-dentition treatment effects.
Woods MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 18331938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentoskeletal treatment changes in Class II subdivision malocclusions in submentovertex and posteroanterior radiographs.
Janson G; Cruz KS; Woodside DG; Metaxas A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Oct; 126(4):451-63. PubMed ID: 15470348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring.
Stromeyer EL; Caruso JM; DeVincenzo JP
Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 12071603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
