167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15133527)
1. The Health Amendment Act allowing access to clinical records.
Wallis K
N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1193):U880. PubMed ID: 15133527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New cervical screening legislation: access to clinical records.
Lewis H
N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1191):U829. PubMed ID: 15107891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical screening legislation is unethical and has the potential to be counter-productive.
Wallis K
N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2840. PubMed ID: 18264209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy Act 1993. Health sector perspective.
Revill S
N Z Health Hospital; 1993; 45(5):suppl 3 p.. PubMed ID: 10129460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Judicial commission & risk management. Commission routinely receives questions, complaints about access to medical records.
Fordham H
Mich Med; 1993 Nov; 92(11):45-8. PubMed ID: 8295560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prescribing privacy: the uncertain role of the physician in the protection of patient privacy.
Gellman RM
North Carol Law Rev; 1984 Jan; 62(2):255-94. PubMed ID: 16100795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ex parte disclosure of patient medical information to third parties involved in litigation with the patient.
Cole CH
Mo Med; 1998 Apr; 95(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 9573729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The seizure of medical records; views on the limits of confidentiality law].
de Jong EJ; Rijksen WP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Apr; 142(16):915-8. PubMed ID: 9623190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physician-patient privilege: the legal assault continues.
McPhedran M
CMAJ; 1996 Jun; 154(11):1760-3. PubMed ID: 8646670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of patient information.
National Health Service (Great Britain)
Bull Med Ethics; 2002 May; (178):8-11. PubMed ID: 12739521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Confidentiality and professional secrecy in the clinical history].
Curiel Herrero J
Med Clin (Barc); 1997 Feb; 108(4):143-5. PubMed ID: 9162785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hippocrates to HIPAA: a foundation for a federal physician-patient privilege.
Ruebner R; Reis LA
Temple Law Rev; 2004; 77(3):505-75. PubMed ID: 17066561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidentiality: a physician/bureaucrat's perspective.
MacMillan R
Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 10126143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Disclosure of patient hospital records under Official Information Act.
Bartlett PJ
N Z Med J; 1987 Sep; 100(832):590-2. PubMed ID: 3452101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Legal problems in access to medical records in psychiatry].
Maruyama E
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2001; 103(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 11383008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The smoking gun: patient confidentiality.
Clark JR
Air Med J; 2012; 31(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 22225557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical problems for physicians raised by AIDS and HIV infection: conflicting legal obligations of confidentiality and disclosure.
McDonald BA
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1989; 22(2):557-92. PubMed ID: 16998984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Synopsis of state case and statutory law.
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 2(2):365-446. PubMed ID: 14606496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Privacy rights in personal information: HIPAA and the privacy gap between fundamental privacy rights and medical information.
Davis KB
John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):535-55. PubMed ID: 16331877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
Silver SA
Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
