149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1513391)
1. Quantifying ambulatory care activities by time and complexity.
Schade JG; Austin JK
Nurs Econ; 1992; 10(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 1513391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambulatory care patient classification.
Hoffman F; Wakefield DS
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):23-30. PubMed ID: 3083055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing intensity: needed today for more than staffing.
Prescott PA
Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 1956428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerization of patient acuity and nursing care planning. New approach to improved patient care and cost-effective staffing.
Adams R; Duchene P
J Nurs Adm; 1985 Apr; 15(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 3845089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A patient classification system for ambulatory care.
Karr J; Fisher R
Nurs Manage; 1997 Sep; 28(9):27-8. PubMed ID: 9335835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient classification in the postanesthesia care unit.
Allen J
J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Aug; 5(4):228-38. PubMed ID: 2388167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Synergy Model. Establishing criteria for 1:1 staffing ratios.
Hartigan RC
Crit Care Nurse; 2000 Apr; 20(2):112, 114-6. PubMed ID: 11873745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of ambulatory nursing practice.
Parrinello KM; Witzel PA
Nurs Econ; 1990; 8(5):322-8. PubMed ID: 2234139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Setting nursing hours standards. Part 1.
Hoffman F; Schaefer T; Zuraikal N
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Jan; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3632802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of the 23-hour patient on nursing workload.
Kumarich D; Biordi DL; Milazzo-Chornick N
J Nurs Adm; 1990 Nov; 20(11):47-52. PubMed ID: 2231015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient requirements for nursing care: the development of an instrument.
Fulton TR; Wilden BM
Can J Nurs Adm; 1998; 11(1):31-51. PubMed ID: 9616555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing nursing staffing ratios: variability in workload intensity.
Upenieks VV; Kotlerman J; Akhavan J; Esser J; Ngo MJ
Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 17470768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nursing staff systems. Gearing care to patient needs.
McNally JK
Cost Containment; 1979 Oct; 1(19):3-5. PubMed ID: 10244119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Acuity and staffing under prospective payment.
Adams R; Johnson B
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Oct; 16(10):21-5. PubMed ID: 3093644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Patient classification system].
Kristiansen E
Sykepleien; 1982 Apr; 69(7):18-25. PubMed ID: 6920863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse staffing: accountability study focuses of staff abilities and patient needs.
Lavery WJ; Maynard WC; Ivan J
Mich Hosp; 1979 Oct; 15(10):26-9. PubMed ID: 10243981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient classification system evaluation. Part 1: Essential system elements.
De Groot HA
J Nurs Adm; 1989 Jun; 19(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 2723792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of an acuity system as it applies to a cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Urbanowicz JA
Comput Nurs; 1999; 17(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 10341478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis of the multiple approaches to measuring nursing workload.
O'Brien-Pallas L
Can J Nurs Adm; 1988 Jun; 1(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 3154031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Patient classification and standards for nursing quality (II). Documentation of patients' need for nursing care as an administrative tool for personnel policy].
Ruland C
Fag Tidsskr Sykepleien; 1989 Nov; 77(19):13-6. PubMed ID: 2638160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
