These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting. Kuijer PP; van Oostrom SH; Duijzer K; van Dieën JH Ergonomics; 2012; 55(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 22409171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks]. Chen J; Yang L Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks. Yu R Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects. Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of lift moment in determining MAWL. Davis KG; Kirking BC; Gaudes LL; Yang J; Marras WS Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 9302891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran. Abadi AS; Mazlomi A; Saraji GN; Zeraati H; Hadian MR; Jafari AH Electron Physician; 2015 Oct; 7(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 26516443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and containers. Lee TH Ind Health; 2005 Apr; 43(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 15895850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of an on-body personal lift assist device (PLAD) on fatigue during a repetitive lifting task. Lotz CA; Agnew MJ; Godwin AA; Stevenson JM J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 18055220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion. Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychophysical acceptability and perception of load heaviness by females. Karwowski W Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):487-96. PubMed ID: 1860464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift. Davis KG; Jorgensen MJ; Marras WS Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10675055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting. Shin G; Mirka G Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are psychophysically chosen lifting loads based on joint kinetics? Banks JJ; Caldwell GE Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():17-23. PubMed ID: 30487096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]