358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15134478)
1. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics.
Cheng X; Bradley A; Thibos LN
J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):310-21. PubMed ID: 15134478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.
Cheng X; Bradley A; Ravikumar S; Thibos LN
Optom Vis Sci; 2010 May; 87(5):300-12. PubMed ID: 20351600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations.
Thibos LN; Hong X; Bradley A; Applegate RA
J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):329-51. PubMed ID: 15134480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential higher-order aberration cues for sphero-cylindrical refractive error development.
Buehren T; Iskander DR; Collins MJ; Davis B
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):163-74. PubMed ID: 17435529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Bühren J; Pesudovs K; Martin T; Strenger A; Yoon G; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 19393883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance.
Marsack JD; Thibos LN; Applegate RA
J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 15134479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of coma and spherical aberration on depth-of-focus measured using adaptive optics and computationally blurred images.
Legras R; Benard Y; Lopez-Gil N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 38(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 22340606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality.
Chen L; Singer B; Guirao A; Porter J; Williams DR
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 May; 82(5):358-69. PubMed ID: 15894912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling the effects of secondary spherical aberration on refractive error, image quality and depth of focus.
Xu R; Bradley A; López Gil N; Thibos LN
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Jan; 35(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 25532544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement and prediction of subjective gradations of images in presence of monochromatic aberrations.
Legras R; Benard Y
Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():52-8. PubMed ID: 23624229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher-order aberrations in eyes with irregular corneas after laser refractive surgery.
McCormick GJ; Porter J; Cox IG; MacRae S
Ophthalmology; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1699-709. PubMed ID: 16095700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of image quality metrics for the prediction of subjective best focus.
Kilintari M; Pallikaris A; Tsiklis N; Ginis HS
Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 87(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 20125061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal image quality.
Buehren T; Collins MJ
Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1633-45. PubMed ID: 16040078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences between wavefront and subjective refraction for infrared light.
Teel DF; Jacobs RJ; Copland J; Neal DR; Thibos LN
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1158-66. PubMed ID: 25148218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sphero-cylindrical error for oblique gaze as a function of the position of the centre of rotation of the eye.
Perches S; Ares J; Collados V; Palos F
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jul; 33(4):456-66. PubMed ID: 23786385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles Crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error: a computational study.
Xu R; Bradley A; Thibos LN
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jul; 33(4):444-55. PubMed ID: 23683093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accounting for the phase, spatial frequency and orientation demands of the task improves metrics based on the visual Strehl ratio.
Young LK; Love GD; Smithson HE
Vision Res; 2013 Sep; 90():57-67. PubMed ID: 23876993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the accommodative response from wavefront aberrations.
Tarrant J; Roorda A; Wildsoet CF
J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):4. PubMed ID: 20616123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance.
Lombardo M; Lombardo G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Feb; 36(2):313-31. PubMed ID: 20152616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
