These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15134941)

  • 1. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 15134943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamics of composite polymerization mediates the development of cuspal strain.
    Bouillaguet S; Gamba J; Forchelet J; Krejci I; Wataha JC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Oct; 22(10):896-902. PubMed ID: 16364426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites.
    Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Nathwani H; Burke FJ; Randall RC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 15766579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
    Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Lee MS; Tu LS; DeLong R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 20970176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
    Kowalczyk P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of different composite restoration techniques on cuspal deflection: an in vitro study.
    González-López S; Lucena-Martín C; de Haro-Gasquet F; Vilchez-Díaz MA; de Haro-Muñoz C
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):656-60. PubMed ID: 15646221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An acoustic emission study on interfacial debonding in composite restorations.
    Liu X; Li H; Li J; Lu P; Fok AS
    Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):934-41. PubMed ID: 21700327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
    El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of cavity type and size of composite restorations on cuspal flexure.
    González López S; Sanz Chinesta MV; Ceballos García L; de Haro Gasquet F; González Rodríguez MP
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2006 Nov; 11(6):E536-40. PubMed ID: 17072261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.