These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15134949)

  • 1. Compressive creep and recovery of light-cured packable composite resins.
    Marghalani HY; Al-Jabab AS
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 15134949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-dependent visco-elastic creep and recovery of flowable composites.
    Baroudi K; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Dec; 115(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 18028062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic and static elastic moduli of packable and flowable composite resins and their development after initial photo curing.
    Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M; Papadogiannis Y; Lakes RS; Dionysopoulos P; Papadogiannis D
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):450-9. PubMed ID: 16099030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative method of measuring the microleakage of thermocycled or non-thermocycled posterior tooth restorations.
    Aguiar FH; Dos Santos AJ; França FM; Paulillo LA; Lovadino JR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 14653296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanoindentation creep versus bulk compressive creep of dental resin-composites.
    El-Safty S; Silikas N; Akhtar R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1171-82. PubMed ID: 22999374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam?
    Suzuki S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(6):355-65; discussion 365-7. PubMed ID: 15801341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of packable composites.
    Herrero AA; Yaman P; Dennison JB
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15709494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shrinkage stress in light-cured composite resins: influence of material and photoactivation mode.
    Charton C; Colon P; Pla F
    Dent Mater; 2007 Aug; 23(8):911-20. PubMed ID: 17027939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hardness and degree of conversion of posterior packable composites.
    Knobloch L; Kerby RE; Clelland N; Lee J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 15646219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the diametral compressive bond strength between composite resin and amalgam in different stages of oxidation.
    Benitez Catirse AB; Oliveira Pagnano V; Da Silva Mello AS; Do Nascimento C; Mardegan Issa JP
    Minerva Stomatol; 2007 Apr; 56(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 17452958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Creep deformation of restorative resin-composites intended for bulk-fill placement.
    El-Safty S; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):928-35. PubMed ID: 22656273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and the flexural strength.
    Gömeç Y; Dörter C; Dabanoglu A; Koray F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Feb; 32(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 15641978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viscoelastic stability of resin-composites aged in food-simulating solvents.
    Marghalani HY; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):963-70. PubMed ID: 23910977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue behavior of packable composites.
    Abe Y; Braem MJ; Lambrechts P; Inoue S; Takeuchi M; Van Meerbeek B
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(17):3405-9. PubMed ID: 15621229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; Berlin JS; Clelland N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 12426502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Creep of posterior dental composites.
    Papadogianis Y; Boyer DB; Lakes RS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Jan; 19(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 4077874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study of the creep of glass-ionomer cements].
    Papadoyannis J; Helvatzoglou-Antoniadis M; Sapountzis M; Kalinderis E
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Dec; 43(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 2518078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The tensile creep characteristics of dental amalgam. I. Stress dependence.
    Cruickshanks-Boyd DW; Roswati N
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Sep; 15(5):769-80. PubMed ID: 12659141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of cross-sectional design on the modulus of elasticity and toughness of fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Dyer SR; Lassila LV; Jokinen M; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 16126074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.