740 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15135517)
21. The Dutch Brucella abortus monitoring programme for cattle: the impact of false-positive serological reactions and comparison of serological tests.
Emmerzaal A; de Wit JJ; Dijkstra T; Bakker D; van Zijderveld FG
Vet Q; 2002 Feb; 24(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11924560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An enzyme immunoassay for bovine brucellosis using a monoclonal antibody specific for field strains of Brucella abortus.
Gorrell MD; Milliken GL; Anderson BJ; Pucci A
Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():491-4. PubMed ID: 6436107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of enzyme-labeled immunosorbent assay and particle concentration fluorescence immunoassay with standard serologic methods and bacteriologic culture for detection of Brucella sp-infected cows in herds with brucellosis.
Nicoletti P; Tanya V
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1993 Jun; 202(12):1975-7. PubMed ID: 8360090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.
Gerbier G; Garin-Bastuji B; Pouillot R; Véry P; Cau C; Berr V; Dufour B; Moutou F
Vet Res; 1997; 28(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 9257445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests.
Weynants V; Tibor A; Denoel PA; Saegerman C; Godfroid J; Thiange P; Letesson JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 48(1-2):101-12. PubMed ID: 8701566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of three serological tests for brucellosis in naturally infected cattle using latent class analysis.
Muma JB; Toft N; Oloya J; Lund A; Nielsen K; Samui K; Skjerve E
Vet Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 125(1-2):187-92. PubMed ID: 17590540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Enzyme immunoassays for serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: A trial in Latin America.
Gall D; Colling A; Marino O; Moreno E; Nielsen K; Perez B; Samartino L
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 1998 Sep; 5(5):654-61. PubMed ID: 9729532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Brucella abortus in captive bison. I. Serology, bacteriology, pathogenesis, and transmission to cattle.
Davis DS; Templeton JW; Ficht TA; Williams JD; Kopec JD; Adams LG
J Wildl Dis; 1990 Jul; 26(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 2117675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with other tests for brucellosis, using sera from experimentally infected heifers.
Ruppanner R; Meyer ME; Willeberg P; Behymer DE
Am J Vet Res; 1980 Aug; 41(8):1329-32. PubMed ID: 7004278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Brucellin skin test as a tool to discriminate false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis.
Pouillot R; Garin-Bastuji B; Gerbier G; Coche Y; Cau C; Dufour B; Moutou F
Vet Res; 1997; 28(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 9257444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fluorescence polarization assay: application to the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Argentina.
Samartino L; Gregoret R; Gall D; Nielsen K
J Immunoassay; 1999 Aug; 20(3):115-26. PubMed ID: 10458638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Safety and immunogenicity of Brucella abortus strain RB51 vaccine in pregnant cattle.
Palmer MV; Olsen SC; Cheville NF
Am J Vet Res; 1997 May; 58(5):472-7. PubMed ID: 9140553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the final stages of a bovine brucellosis eradication program.
Sutherland SS; Evans RJ; Bathgate J
Aust Vet J; 1986 Dec; 63(12):412-5. PubMed ID: 3099740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the fluorescence polarization assay and comparison to other serological assays for the detection of serum antibodies to Brucella abortus in bison.
Gall D; Nielsen K; Forbes L; Davis D; Elzer P; Olsen S; Balsevicius S; Kelly L; Smith P; Tan S; Joly D
J Wildl Dis; 2000 Jul; 36(3):469-76. PubMed ID: 10941731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Serological diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle. A comparison between ELISA (IgG) and classical serological tests].
Trap D; Gaumont R
Dev Biol Stand; 1984; 56():451-63. PubMed ID: 6436104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of stage of gestation and breed on bovine responses to vaccination with Brucella abortus strain 19.
Crawford RP; Adams LG; Ficht TA; Williams JD
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1991 Oct; 199(7):887-91. PubMed ID: 1769876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Mainar-Jaime RC; Muñoz PM; de Miguel MJ; Grilló MJ; Marín CM; Moriyón I; Blasco JM
Can Vet J; 2005 Oct; 46(10):913-6. PubMed ID: 16454384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of three competitive ELISAs and a fluorescence polarisation assay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.
Praud A; Durán-Ferrer M; Fretin D; Jaÿ M; O'Connor M; Stournara A; Tittarelli M; Travassos Dias I; Garin-Bastuji B
Vet J; 2016 Oct; 216():38-44. PubMed ID: 27687924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [The background of the serological cross-reaction between Yersinia and Brucella and the possibility of differential diagnostics by the ELISA technique and the electroimmuno assay (rocket electrophoresis) (author's transl)].
Hurvell B
Nord Vet Med; 1978; 30(7-8):305-17. PubMed ID: 693273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An evaluation of ELISA using recombinant Brucella abortus bacterioferritin (Bfr) for bovine brucellosis.
Hop HT; Arayan LT; Simborio HL; Reyes AW; Min W; Lee HJ; Lee JJ; Chang HH; Kim S
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Apr; 45():16-9. PubMed ID: 27012915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
