296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15135836)
1. A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline.
Mazumdar M; Smith A; Schwartz LH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 15135836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable?
Forner A; Ayuso C; Varela M; Rimola J; Hessheimer AJ; de Lope CR; Reig M; Bianchi L; Llovet JM; Bruix J
Cancer; 2009 Feb; 115(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 19117042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment "RECIST"].
Sasaki T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 Dec; 27(14):2179-84. PubMed ID: 11142160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response assessment classification in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated on clinical trials.
Schwartz LH; Mazumdar M; Wang L; Smith A; Marion S; Panicek DM; Motzer RJ
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(8):1611-9. PubMed ID: 14534876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lencioni R; Llovet JM
Semin Liver Dis; 2010 Feb; 30(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 20175033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual patient data analysis to assess modifications to the RECIST criteria.
Bogaerts J; Ford R; Sargent D; Schwartz LH; Rubinstein L; Lacombe D; Eisenhauer E; Verweij J; Therasse P;
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):248-60. PubMed ID: 19095437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors].
Duffaud F; Therasse P
Bull Cancer; 2000 Dec; 87(12):881-6. PubMed ID: 11174117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Transarterial chemoperfusion of the pelvis--results in symptomatic locally recurrent tumors and lymph node metastases].
Vogl TJ; Zangos S; Eichler K; Balzer JO; Jacob U; Keilhauer R; Bauer RW
Rofo; 2007 Nov; 179(11):1174-80. PubMed ID: 17805998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection of response criteria for clinical trials of sarcoma treatment.
Schuetze SM; Baker LH; Benjamin RS; Canetta R
Oncologist; 2008; 13 Suppl 2():32-40. PubMed ID: 18434637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment.
Therasse P; Eisenhauer EA; Verweij J
Eur J Cancer; 2006 May; 42(8):1031-9. PubMed ID: 16616487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative hyperfractionated chemoradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer in patients previously irradiated to the pelvis: A multicentric phase II study.
Valentini V; Morganti AG; Gambacorta MA; Mohiuddin M; Doglietto GB; Coco C; De Paoli A; Rossi C; Di Russo A; Valvo F; Bolzicco G; Dalla Palma M;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(4):1129-39. PubMed ID: 16414206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response.
Erasmus JJ; Gladish GW; Broemeling L; Sabloff BS; Truong MT; Herbst RS; Munden RF
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jul; 21(13):2574-82. PubMed ID: 12829678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of RECIST 1.1 for non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Sun JM; Ahn MJ; Park MJ; Yi JH; Kim TS; Chung MJ; Park YH; Ahn JS; Park K
Lung Cancer; 2010 Jul; 69(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 19959251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST.
Benjamin RS; Choi H; Macapinlac HA; Burgess MA; Patel SR; Chen LL; Podoloff DA; Charnsangavej C
J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 25(13):1760-4. PubMed ID: 17470866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response rates: a valuable signal of promising activity?
Pivot X; Thierry-Vuillemin A; Villanueva C; Bazan F
Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 19826354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of radiological and pathohistological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) and study of response dependence on the applied thermal parameters in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS).
Stahl R; Wang T; Lindner LH; Abdel-Rahman S; Santl M; Reiser MF; Issels RD
Int J Hyperthermia; 2009 Jun; 25(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 19670096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiologic measurements of tumor response to treatment: practical approaches and limitations.
Suzuki C; Jacobsson H; Hatschek T; Torkzad MR; Bodén K; Eriksson-Alm Y; Berg E; Fujii H; Kubo A; Blomqvist L
Radiographics; 2008; 28(2):329-44. PubMed ID: 18349443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SARC-CTOS imaging symposium: introduction to the problem from a clinical perspective.
Benjamin RS
Oncologist; 2008; 13 Suppl 2():1-3. PubMed ID: 18434630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A summary report of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST criteria)].
Kusaba H; Saijo N
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 Jan; 27(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10660728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stable disease is a valid end point in clinical trials.
Tolcher AW
Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 19826356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
