These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15135978)

  • 21. The neurotensin receptor agonist NT69L suppresses sucrose-reinforced operant behavior in the rat.
    Boules M; Iversen I; Oliveros A; Shaw A; Williams K; Robinson J; Fredrickson P; Richelson E
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1127(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 17113052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Female rats that rapidly acquire a d-amphetamine discrimination generalize more to d-amphetamine.
    Tomie A; Mosakowski EM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1996 Aug; 54(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 8853192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attenuation of the amphetamine discriminative cue in rats with the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine.
    Mechanic JA; Wasielewski JA; Carl KL; Holloway FA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2002 Jul; 72(4):767-77. PubMed ID: 12062565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early maternal separation and sex differences in the aversive effects of amphetamine in adult rats.
    Roma PG; Davis CM; Kohut SJ; Huntsberry ME; Riley AL
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Mar; 93(4-5):897-904. PubMed ID: 18230402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. WAY 100635 produces discriminative stimulus effects in rats mediated by dopamine D(4) receptor activation.
    Marona-Lewicka D; Nichols DE
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Feb; 20(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 19179855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Caffeine induces differential cross tolerance to the amphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects of dopaminergic agonists.
    Jain R; Holtzman SG
    Brain Res Bull; 2005 May; 65(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 15833596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiple drug training as a method for increasing the specificity of the drug discrimination procedure.
    Overton DA
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1982 Apr; 221(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 7062280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Drug discrimination in rats: evidence for amphetamine-like cue state following chronic haloperidol.
    Barrett RJ; Steranka LR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1983 Apr; 18(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 6867066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Yohimbine-induced stimulus control in the rat.
    Winter JC
    Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1978 Sep; 235(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 736694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dissociation in the modulatory effects of environmental novelty on the locomotor, analgesic, and eating response to acute and repeated morphine in the rat.
    Paolone G; Burdino R; Badiani A
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Mar; 166(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 12545329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine.
    Bevins RA; Peterson JL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2004 Sep; 79(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15388285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A sensitizing regimen of amphetamine that disrupts attentional set-shifting does not disrupt working or long-term memory.
    Featherstone RE; Rizos Z; Kapur S; Fletcher PJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 May; 189(1):170-9. PubMed ID: 18299157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization is modulated by environmental stimuli.
    Fraioli S; Crombag HS; Badiani A; Robinson TE
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 1999 Jun; 20(6):533-41. PubMed ID: 10327423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine and D-amphetamine on the ability of rats to discriminate the durations and intensities of light stimuli.
    Hampson CL; Body S; den Boon FS; Cheung TH; Bezzina G; Langley RW; Fone KC; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 21(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19949322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Post-training amphetamine administration enhances memory consolidation in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: Implications for drug addiction.
    Simon NW; Setlow B
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2006 Nov; 86(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 16750404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An unexpected reduction in sucrose concentration activates the HPA axis on successive post shift days without attenuation by discriminative contextual stimuli.
    Pecoraro N; de Jong H; Dallman MF
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Mar; 96(4-5):651-61. PubMed ID: 19162053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anatomical substrates for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats.
    Nakajima A; Yamada K; He J; Zeng N; Nitta A; Nabeshima T
    J Neurochem; 2004 Oct; 91(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 15447664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Black agouti (ACI) rats show greater drug- and cue-induced reinstatement of methamphetamine-seeking behavior than Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.
    Xi J; Kruzich PJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2007 May; 87(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 17481706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Selective strengthening of conditioned behaviors that occur during periods of amphetamine exposure.
    Wan X; Holden JM; Lynch KG; Peoples LL
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2007 Jun; 32(6):1346-57. PubMed ID: 17164823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.