These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Effect of amphetamine on response inhibition in rats showing high or low response to novelty. Bardo MT; Cain ME; Bylica KE Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2006 Sep; 85(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 16904737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The psychogenetically selected Roman rat lines differ in the susceptibility to develop amphetamine sensitization. Corda MG; Piras G; Lecca D; Fernández-Teruel A; Driscoll P; Giorgi O Behav Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 157(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 15617781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Varied effects of conventional antiepileptics on responding maintained by negative versus positive reinforcement. Roberts C; Harvey MT; May ME; Valdovinos MG; Patterson TG; Couppis MH; Kennedy CH Physiol Behav; 2008 Feb; 93(3):612-21. PubMed ID: 18061218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Drug discrimination analysis of pseudoephedrine in rats. Tongjaroenbuangam W; Meksuriyen D; Govitrapong P; Kotchabhakdi N; Baldwin BA Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Feb; 59(2):505-10. PubMed ID: 9477001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The monoamine oxidase inhibitor phenelzine enhances the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine in rats. Wooters TE; Bardo MT Behav Pharmacol; 2007 Nov; 18(7):601-8. PubMed ID: 17912044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The reinforcing and discriminative stimulus properties of para-ethoxy- and para-methoxyamphetamine. Corrigall WA; Robertson JM; Coen KM; Lodge BA Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Jan; 41(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 1539067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Schedule-dependent effects of haloperidol and amphetamine: multiple-schedule task shows within-subject effects. Caul WF; Brindle NA Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001 Jan; 68(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 11274708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Progress report from the testing program for stimulant and depressant drug (1992). Woolverton WL; Nader MA; Winger G; Woods JH; Patrick GA; Harris LS NIDA Res Monogr; 1993; 132():579-94. PubMed ID: 8101976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. ABA chronic dosing of D-amphetamine produces differential drug effects in two variants of a temporal discrimination procedure in pigeons. McClure EA; Saulsgiver KA; Wynne CD Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 20(8):705-19. PubMed ID: 19901824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Toward a behavioral toxicology of paint thinner. Colotla VA; Lorenzana-Jiménez M; Rodríguez R Neurobehav Toxicol; 1980; 2(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7442918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. In a low-versus high-dose drug discrimination task, random reinforcement in one drug state alters discriminative control only in that state. Rijnders HJ; Järbe TU; Slangen JL Behav Pharmacol; 1993 Feb; 4(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 11224169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of rate-dependency and internal clock effects of D-amphetamine. Orduña V; García A; Bouzas A Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):428-32. PubMed ID: 22542957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. 1-(2,3-Methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (2,3-MDA): a preliminary investigation. Glennon RA; Young R; Soine W Gen Pharmacol; 1984; 15(4):361-2. PubMed ID: 6149169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of R-2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (R-DOM) and S-amphetamine in the rat. Tilson HA; Baker TG; Gylys JA Psychopharmacologia; 1975 Nov; 44(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 1208758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Amphetamine-haloperidol discrimination: effects of chronic drug treatment. Haenlein M; Caul WF; Barrett RJ Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Dec; 23(6):949-52. PubMed ID: 4080781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]